2008The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Dialectal differences in dynamic formant patterns in vowels.

Robert A. Fox, Ewa Jacewicz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study examines basic acoustic variation in the dynamic patterns of vowel formants among three regional variants of American English spoken in southeastern Wisconsin (affected by the Northern Cities Shift), western North Carolina (Appalachian English affected by the Southern Vowel Shift), and central Ohio (not considered to be affected currently by any vowel shift). Three groups of speakers (including men and women) produced vowels in citation form (in a /hVd/ context) and in sentences. The sentence material elicited two degrees of vowel emphasis (high and low) in the /bVd/ and /bVt/ contexts. The frequencies and amplitudes of the first three formants were extracted at points corresponding to 20%-35%-50%-65%-80% of the vowel’s duration. A set of dynamic measures was then calculated using these values that included overall signed/unsigned change in formant frequencies, vector and trajectory lengths, direction/angle of vowel movement in the F1 by F2 plane, and rate of frequency change. The results show significant cross-dialectal differences in formant patterns in monophthongs, phonemic diphthongs, and nonphonemic diphthongs. The nature and extent of these formant changes varied as a function of speaker dialect in a manner apart from expected variation resulting from phonetic and prosodic context and speaking style. [Work supported by NIH.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines basic acoustic variation in the dynamic patterns of vowel formants among three regional variants of American English spoken in southeastern Wisconsin (affected by the Northern Cities Shift), western North Carolina (Appalachian English affected by the Southern Vowel Shift), and central Ohio (not considered to be affected currently by any vowel shift). Three groups of speakers (including men and women) produced vowels in citation form (in a /hVd/ context) and in sentences. The sentence material elicited two degrees of vowel emphasis (high and low) in the /bVd/ and /bVt/ contexts. The frequencies and amplitudes of the first three formants were extracted at points corresponding to 20%-35%-50%-65%-80% of the vowel’s duration. A set of dynamic measures was then calculated using these values that included overall signed/unsigned change in formant frequencies, vector and trajectory lengths, direction/angle of vowel movement in the F1 by F2 plane, and rate of frequency change. The results show significant cross-dialectal differences in formant patterns in monophthongs, phonemic diphthongs, and nonphonemic diphthongs. The nature and extent of these formant changes varied as a function of speaker dialect in a manner apart from expected variation resulting from phonetic and prosodic context and speaking style. [Work supported by NIH.]

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines basic acoustic variation in the dynamic patterns of vowel formants among three regional variants of American English spoken in southeastern Wisconsin (affected by the Northern Cities Shift), western North Carolina (Appalachian English affected by the Southern Vowel Shift), and central Ohio (not considered to be affected currently by any vowel shift). Three groups of speakers (including men and women) produced vowels in citation form (in a /hVd/ context) and in sentences. The sentence material elicited two degrees of vowel emphasis (high and low) in the /bVd/ and /bVt/ contexts. The frequencies and amplitudes of the first three formants were extracted at points corresponding to 20%-35%-50%-65%-80% of the vowel’s duration. A set of dynamic measures was then calculated using these values that included overall signed/unsigned change in formant frequencies, vector and trajectory lengths, direction/angle of vowel movement in the F1 by F2 plane, and rate of frequency change. The results show significant cross-dialectal differences in formant patterns in monophthongs, phonemic diphthongs, and nonphonemic diphthongs. The nature and extent of these formant changes varied as a function of speaker dialect in a manner apart from expected variation resulting from phonetic and prosodic context and speaking style. [Work supported by NIH.]

Key concepts: Formant, Diphthong, Vowel, Context (archaeology), Variation (astronomy), Mid vowel, American English, Duration (music)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dialectal differences in dynamic formant patterns in vowels. — Research Paper | ScholarLens