1966Archives of OphthalmologyRequires access

A Comparison of Two Different Staining Methods for Evaluating Corneal Endothelial Viability

Frederick W. Stocker, Elizabeth King, D O Lucas, N Georgiade

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

Because of drawbacks in both tissue culture and para-nitroblue tetrazolium (PNBT) staining as methods for determining endothelial viability, a supravital stain (trypan blue) was evaluated as a possible means of accomplishing this. Rabbit and human corneas, fresh or stored, were bisected and stained with PNBT and trypan blue, and the viability estimated. In general, the two stains showed a good correlation, but the estimates from two different observers were of interest. Observer A found a 30% average difference between the PNBT and the trypan blue estimates; observer B found only a 10% average difference. This was probably due to the wide range of stain intensity with the PNBT method; all stained cells were called viable by observer A, while only those deeply stained were called viable by observer B. Trypan blue staining appears to give equal or better accuracy in evaluating endothelial viability, as well as being a simpler and quicker method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Because of drawbacks in both tissue culture and para-nitroblue tetrazolium (PNBT) staining as methods for determining endothelial viability, a supravital stain (trypan blue) was evaluated as a possible means of accomplishing this. Rabbit and human corneas, fresh or stored, were bisected and stained with PNBT and trypan blue, and the viability estimated. In general, the two stains showed a good correlation, but the estimates from two different observers were of interest. Observer A found a 30% average difference between the PNBT and the trypan blue estimates; observer B found only a 10% average difference. This was probably due to the wide range of stain intensity with the PNBT method; all stained cells were called viable by observer A, while only those deeply stained were called viable by observer B. Trypan blue staining appears to give equal or better accuracy in evaluating endothelial viability, as well as being a simpler and quicker method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Because of drawbacks in both tissue culture and para-nitroblue tetrazolium (PNBT) staining as methods for determining endothelial viability, a supravital stain (trypan blue) was evaluated as a possible means of accomplishing this. Rabbit and human corneas, fresh or stored, were bisected and stained with PNBT and trypan blue, and the viability estimated. In general, the two stains showed a good correlation, but the estimates from two different observers were of interest. Observer A found a 30% average difference between the PNBT and the trypan blue estimates; observer B found only a 10% average difference. This was probably due to the wide range of stain intensity with the PNBT method; all stained cells were called viable by observer A, while only those deeply stained were called viable by observer B. Trypan blue staining appears to give equal or better accuracy in evaluating endothelial viability, as well as being a simpler and quicker method.

Key concepts: Staining, Ophthalmology, Cornea, Medicine, Biology, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Two Different Staining Methods for Evaluating Corneal Endothelial Viability — Research Paper | ScholarLens