2012Unpublished venueRequires access

On the structural identifiability of joint parameters from motion capture data

Quang‐Cuong Pham, Ko Ayusawa, Kanade Kubota, Yoshihiko Nakamura

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

To identify the joint parameters (e.g. the position of the joint center for a spherical joint, the position and the orientation of the joint axis for a revolute joint, etc.) from motion capture data, existing provably-correct algorithms require that at least three markers be attached to either of the two links adjacent to the joint. However, as shown in this article, it turns out that the identification of the joint parameters requires, for most types of joints, strictly less than three markers on any link. More precisely, we prove the structural identifiability of joint parameters in the following cases: (a) a spherical joint with two markers attached to each of the two adjacent links; (b) a revolute joint with two markers attached to one of the two links, and one marker attached to the other. We provide a practical algorithm to do the identification in case (a). Finally, we show that identification cannot be achieved with strictly fewer markers than listed in (a) and (b).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To identify the joint parameters (e.g. the position of the joint center for a spherical joint, the position and the orientation of the joint axis for a revolute joint, etc.) from motion capture data, existing provably-correct algorithms require that at least three markers be attached to either of the two links adjacent to the joint. However, as shown in this article, it turns out that the identification of the joint parameters requires, for most types of joints, strictly less than three markers on any link. More precisely, we prove the structural identifiability of joint parameters in the following cases: (a) a spherical joint with two markers attached to each of the two adjacent links; (b) a revolute joint with two markers attached to one of the two links, and one marker attached to the other. We provide a practical algorithm to do the identification in case (a). Finally, we show that identification cannot be achieved with strictly fewer markers than listed in (a) and (b).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To identify the joint parameters (e.g. the position of the joint center for a spherical joint, the position and the orientation of the joint axis for a revolute joint, etc.) from motion capture data, existing provably-correct algorithms require that at least three markers be attached to either of the two links adjacent to the joint. However, as shown in this article, it turns out that the identification of the joint parameters requires, for most types of joints, strictly less than three markers on any link. More precisely, we prove the structural identifiability of joint parameters in the following cases: (a) a spherical joint with two markers attached to each of the two adjacent links; (b) a revolute joint with two markers attached to one of the two links, and one marker attached to the other. We provide a practical algorithm to do the identification in case (a). Finally, we show that identification cannot be achieved with strictly fewer markers than listed in (a) and (b).

Key concepts: Identifiability, Revolute joint, Joint (building), Position (finance), Computer science, Identification (biology), Motion (physics), Algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the structural identifiability of joint parameters from motion capture data — Research Paper | ScholarLens