2012•Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and PlanningRequires access

Quantity and quality of public open spaces in Israel

Yodan Rofè, Gabriella Feierstein, Inbal Zarchin

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Neighbourhood public open spaces (POS) are generally considered to be essential for a good quality of urban life. Few studies attempt to examine the contribution of POS to the life of residents across different climate zones and settlement sizes. This research employed three different methods to evaluate POS in ordinary neighbourhoods in Israel: observation of activity, survey of residents’ attitudes towards them and mapping feelings while walking through them. The research shows that while neighbourhoods in Israel do not lack POS, their quality leaves much to be desired, particularly in desert cities and towns. The various methods of evaluating the quality of POS have resulted in mixed messages: while civic spaces were the most intensively used, people's feelings were better in green POS; residents ranked neighbourhood POS as least attractive for spending time outdoors, yet perceived them as important for their quality of life. In smaller and low-density neighbourhoods, little use of green POS was in evidence, and yet appreciation and satisfaction with them were highest. The results indicate that it is time to depart from the exclusive use of quantitative standards in assessing POS provision, and that the quality and success of POS must be measured using diverse methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Neighbourhood public open spaces (POS) are generally considered to be essential for a good quality of urban life. Few studies attempt to examine the contribution of POS to the life of residents across different climate zones and settlement sizes. This research employed three different methods to evaluate POS in ordinary neighbourhoods in Israel: observation of activity, survey of residents’ attitudes towards them and mapping feelings while walking through them. The research shows that while neighbourhoods in Israel do not lack POS, their quality leaves much to be desired, particularly in desert cities and towns. The various methods of evaluating the quality of POS have resulted in mixed messages: while civic spaces were the most intensively used, people's feelings were better in green POS; residents ranked neighbourhood POS as least attractive for spending time outdoors, yet perceived them as important for their quality of life. In smaller and low-density neighbourhoods, little use of green POS was in evidence, and yet appreciation and satisfaction with them were highest. The results indicate that it is time to depart from the exclusive use of quantitative standards in assessing POS provision, and that the quality and success of POS must be measured using diverse methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Neighbourhood public open spaces (POS) are generally considered to be essential for a good quality of urban life. Few studies attempt to examine the contribution of POS to the life of residents across different climate zones and settlement sizes. This research employed three different methods to evaluate POS in ordinary neighbourhoods in Israel: observation of activity, survey of residents’ attitudes towards them and mapping feelings while walking through them. The research shows that while neighbourhoods in Israel do not lack POS, their quality leaves much to be desired, particularly in desert cities and towns. The various methods of evaluating the quality of POS have resulted in mixed messages: while civic spaces were the most intensively used, people's feelings were better in green POS; residents ranked neighbourhood POS as least attractive for spending time outdoors, yet perceived them as important for their quality of life. In smaller and low-density neighbourhoods, little use of green POS was in evidence, and yet appreciation and satisfaction with them were highest. The results indicate that it is time to depart from the exclusive use of quantitative standards in assessing POS provision, and that the quality and success of POS must be measured using diverse methods.

Key concepts: Neighbourhood (mathematics), Feeling, Quality (philosophy), Geography, Settlement (finance), Public open space, Quality of life (healthcare), Socioeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantity and quality of public open spaces in Israel — Research Paper | ScholarLens