2008Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition)Requires access

Analysis of Dynamic Responses of Deck Pavements for Long-span Steel Box Girder Bridge

Bo Yao, Zhendong Qian

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Aiming at the common damages of steel bridge deck pavement, such as pushing, slippage, cracking, etc., dynamic characteristic and shapes of traffic loads were analyzed. By simulating wheel loads as moving dead loads, dynamic responses of six types of pavement system subject to moving loads were investigated using finite element method and three mechanical indexes, and the results were compared with the static ones, thus the optimal structure was given. The analysis results show that dynamic responses of deck pavements are different form the static ones. The worst load position in on the mid-span of two transversal diaphragms. The traffic loads on the pavements mostly like half-sinusoid loads. The obvious errors exist in static calculations of the shear stresses between deck and pavement, and larger shear force between deck and pavement caused by dynamic loads is the main reason of damage types of pushing and local packing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aiming at the common damages of steel bridge deck pavement, such as pushing, slippage, cracking, etc., dynamic characteristic and shapes of traffic loads were analyzed. By simulating wheel loads as moving dead loads, dynamic responses of six types of pavement system subject to moving loads were investigated using finite element method and three mechanical indexes, and the results were compared with the static ones, thus the optimal structure was given. The analysis results show that dynamic responses of deck pavements are different form the static ones. The worst load position in on the mid-span of two transversal diaphragms. The traffic loads on the pavements mostly like half-sinusoid loads. The obvious errors exist in static calculations of the shear stresses between deck and pavement, and larger shear force between deck and pavement caused by dynamic loads is the main reason of damage types of pushing and local packing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aiming at the common damages of steel bridge deck pavement, such as pushing, slippage, cracking, etc., dynamic characteristic and shapes of traffic loads were analyzed. By simulating wheel loads as moving dead loads, dynamic responses of six types of pavement system subject to moving loads were investigated using finite element method and three mechanical indexes, and the results were compared with the static ones, thus the optimal structure was given. The analysis results show that dynamic responses of deck pavements are different form the static ones. The worst load position in on the mid-span of two transversal diaphragms. The traffic loads on the pavements mostly like half-sinusoid loads. The obvious errors exist in static calculations of the shear stresses between deck and pavement, and larger shear force between deck and pavement caused by dynamic loads is the main reason of damage types of pushing and local packing.

Key concepts: Structural engineering, Deck, Slippage, Structural load, Finite element method, Engineering, Moving load, Structural dynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Dynamic Responses of Deck Pavements for Long-span Steel Box Girder Bridge — Research Paper | ScholarLens