1997Asia-Pacific ReviewRequires access

Is one‐party dominance reemerging in Japan?

Seizaburō Satō

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Predictions that a two‐party system would emerge in Japan as a result of changes in the electoral system first implemented in the October 1996 election have not been realized, nor have other benefits promised by the advocates of electoral reform materialized. Seizaburo Sato, IIPS research director, says the serious losers in the election were not a political party or parties but the proponents of the latest round of electoral reform. He suggests the LDP is likely to regain the position of majority party even before the next election, and argues that the 1996 election may mark the advent of another era of LDP one‐party supremacy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Predictions that a two‐party system would emerge in Japan as a result of changes in the electoral system first implemented in the October 1996 election have not been realized, nor have other benefits promised by the advocates of electoral reform materialized. Seizaburo Sato, IIPS research director, says the serious losers in the election were not a political party or parties but the proponents of the latest round of electoral reform. He suggests the LDP is likely to regain the position of majority party even before the next election, and argues that the 1996 election may mark the advent of another era of LDP one‐party supremacy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Predictions that a two‐party system would emerge in Japan as a result of changes in the electoral system first implemented in the October 1996 election have not been realized, nor have other benefits promised by the advocates of electoral reform materialized. Seizaburo Sato, IIPS research director, says the serious losers in the election were not a political party or parties but the proponents of the latest round of electoral reform. He suggests the LDP is likely to regain the position of majority party even before the next election, and argues that the 1996 election may mark the advent of another era of LDP one‐party supremacy.

Key concepts: Dominance (genetics), Political science, Politics, Electoral system, Realigning election, Single non-transferable vote, Position (finance), Primary election

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is one‐party dominance reemerging in Japan? — Research Paper | ScholarLens