Through the rhetorical looking‐glass: Consensus theory and fairy tales in the epistemology of communication—A reply to Bineham
James W. Hikins
Abstract
James W. Hikins
Abstract
This critique seeks to uncover issues in rhetorical epistemology whose significance transcends religious communication and commitment, though remarks are confined mostly to the context of Bineham's essay. The critique includes an examination of consensus‐based epistemology as a model for understanding religious belief, and an exploration of the theory of meaning reflected in Bineham's essay. These permit a discussion of the implications of Bineham's position for rhetorical criticism and a generalization about the adequacy of consensus doctrine for illuminating all forms of discursive activity.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This critique seeks to uncover issues in rhetorical epistemology whose significance transcends religious communication and commitment, though remarks are confined mostly to the context of Bineham's essay. The critique includes an examination of consensus‐based epistemology as a model for understanding religious belief, and an exploration of the theory of meaning reflected in Bineham's essay. These permit a discussion of the implications of Bineham's position for rhetorical criticism and a generalization about the adequacy of consensus doctrine for illuminating all forms of discursive activity.
Key concepts: Rhetorical question, Epistemology, Rhetorical criticism, Doctrine, Criticism, Meaning (existential), Context (archaeology), Generalization