1994HeartOpen access

Prognosis in patients with diphtheric myocarditis and bradyarrhythmias: assessment of results of ventricular pacing.

B Stockins, Fernando Laņas, Jesús Saavedra, J A Opazo

Open full text 45 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognosis in patients with diphtherial myocarditis and bradyarrhythmias and to assess the results of ventricular pacing in those with third degree atrioventricular block. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Referral department of cardiology in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty four out of 46 patients admitted with diphtherial myocarditis over 10 years had bradyarrhythmias. Six had sinus bradycardia, 15 atrioventricular or intraventricular conduction disturbances, and three atrioventricular dissociation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Death rate. RESULTS: Eleven patients died (46%): all seven patients with third degree atrioventricular block, the patient with bifascicular block, and three of the six patients with bundle branch block. Seven died of cardiogenic shock and four of ventricular fibrillation. All nine patients with sinus bradycardia or atrioventricular dissociation survived. CONCLUSION: Conduction system disturbances in patients with diphtherial myocarditis are markers of severe myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. In addition, ventricular pacing does not improve survival.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognosis in patients with diphtherial myocarditis and bradyarrhythmias and to assess the results of ventricular pacing in those with third degree atrioventricular block. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Referral department of cardiology in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty four out of 46 patients admitted with diphtherial myocarditis over 10 years had bradyarrhythmias. Six had sinus bradycardia, 15 atrioventricular or intraventricular conduction disturbances, and three atrioventricular dissociation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Death rate. RESULTS: Eleven patients died (46%): all seven patients with third degree atrioventricular block, the patient with bifascicular block, and three of the six patients with bundle branch block. Seven died of cardiogenic shock and four of ventricular fibrillation. All nine patients with sinus bradycardia or atrioventricular dissociation survived. CONCLUSION: Conduction system disturbances in patients with diphtherial myocarditis are markers of severe myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. In addition, ventricular pacing does not improve survival.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognosis in patients with diphtherial myocarditis and bradyarrhythmias and to assess the results of ventricular pacing in those with third degree atrioventricular block. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Referral department of cardiology in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty four out of 46 patients admitted with diphtherial myocarditis over 10 years had bradyarrhythmias. Six had sinus bradycardia, 15 atrioventricular or intraventricular conduction disturbances, and three atrioventricular dissociation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Death rate. RESULTS: Eleven patients died (46%): all seven patients with third degree atrioventricular block, the patient with bifascicular block, and three of the six patients with bundle branch block. Seven died of cardiogenic shock and four of ventricular fibrillation. All nine patients with sinus bradycardia or atrioventricular dissociation survived. CONCLUSION: Conduction system disturbances in patients with diphtherial myocarditis are markers of severe myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. In addition, ventricular pacing does not improve survival.

Key concepts: Medicine, Myocarditis, Bradycardia, Ventricular pacing, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Cardiac pacing, Electrocardiography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prognosis in patients with diphtheric myocarditis and bradyarrhythmias: assessment of results of ventricular pacing. — Research Paper | ScholarLens