2003•Acta Ophthalmologica ScandinavicaOpen access

Frequency doubling technology and high‐pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Lada Kalaboukhova, Bertil Lindblom

Open full text 15 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the correlation between frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT) and high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP) in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma, suspect glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and in normal eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients (162 eyes) were studied. Visual fields were assessed by HRP, FDT screening C-20-5 and FDT threshold C-20 programs. In eyes with a discrepancy between the test results, a comprehensive clinical examination was performed, including optic disc photography and Heidelberg retinal tomography (HRT). RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between HRP global deviation and the FDT mean deviation (for FDT threshold C-20 test), and between HRP score and FDT score (for FDT screening C-20-5 ). The correlation coefficients were r = -0.83 and r = 0.77, respectively. In all, 75 eyes (46.3%) had normal HRP and FDT screening results, while 67 eyes (41.4%) showed abnormal results in both tests. In 12 eyes (7.4%) HRP was within normal limits while FDT screening was abnormal. Seven of these eyes were judged to have glaucoma; three of them had converted from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. In eight eyes (4.9%) HRP was abnormal while FDT screening was normal. Three of these were judged to have glaucoma. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of the FDT screening test for the detection of glaucoma were 91.7% and 87.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a strong correlation between FDT threshold C-20, FDT screening C-20-5 and HRP test results. Frequency doubling technology perimetry C-20-5 represents a good screening test for the detection of optic nerve damage in open-angle glaucoma.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To study the correlation between frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT) and high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP) in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma, suspect glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and in normal eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients (162 eyes) were studied. Visual fields were assessed by HRP, FDT screening C-20-5 and FDT threshold C-20 programs. In eyes with a discrepancy between the test results, a comprehensive clinical examination was performed, including optic disc photography and Heidelberg retinal tomography (HRT). RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between HRP global deviation and the FDT mean deviation (for FDT threshold C-20 test), and between HRP score and FDT score (for FDT screening C-20-5 ). The correlation coefficients were r = -0.83 and r = 0.77, respectively. In all, 75 eyes (46.3%) had normal HRP and FDT screening results, while 67 eyes (41.4%) showed abnormal results in both tests. In 12 eyes (7.4%) HRP was within normal limits while FDT screening was abnormal. Seven of these eyes were judged to have glaucoma; three of them had converted from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. In eight eyes (4.9%) HRP was abnormal while FDT screening was normal. Three of these were judged to have glaucoma. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of the FDT screening test for the detection of glaucoma were 91.7% and 87.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a strong correlation between FDT threshold C-20, FDT screening C-20-5 and HRP test results. Frequency doubling technology perimetry C-20-5 represents a good screening test for the detection of optic nerve damage in open-angle glaucoma.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To study the correlation between frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT) and high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP) in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma, suspect glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and in normal eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients (162 eyes) were studied. Visual fields were assessed by HRP, FDT screening C-20-5 and FDT threshold C-20 programs. In eyes with a discrepancy between the test results, a comprehensive clinical examination was performed, including optic disc photography and Heidelberg retinal tomography (HRT). RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between HRP global deviation and the FDT mean deviation (for FDT threshold C-20 test), and between HRP score and FDT score (for FDT screening C-20-5 ). The correlation coefficients were r = -0.83 and r = 0.77, respectively. In all, 75 eyes (46.3%) had normal HRP and FDT screening results, while 67 eyes (41.4%) showed abnormal results in both tests. In 12 eyes (7.4%) HRP was within normal limits while FDT screening was abnormal. Seven of these eyes were judged to have glaucoma; three of them had converted from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. In eight eyes (4.9%) HRP was abnormal while FDT screening was normal. Three of these were judged to have glaucoma. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of the FDT screening test for the detection of glaucoma were 91.7% and 87.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a strong correlation between FDT threshold C-20, FDT screening C-20-5 and HRP test results. Frequency doubling technology perimetry C-20-5 represents a good screening test for the detection of optic nerve damage in open-angle glaucoma.

Key concepts: Medicine, Glaucoma, Ophthalmology, Ocular hypertension, Open angle glaucoma, Retinal, Absolute deviation, Screening test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Frequency doubling technology and high‐pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens