1991Soil ScienceRequires access

RELIABILITY OF MERCURY INTRUSION POROSIMETRY RESULTS FOR SOILS

E. Kozak, J Stawinski, Jacek Wierzchoś

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Verification of reliability of mercury intrusion porosimetry results for natural soils by confronting a volume of pores filled with water at particular pF with volumes of corresponding pores determined by mercury porosimetry/particle density was discussed. It was stated that a positive value of the difference between the mentioned volumes constitutes the sufficient evidence of sample destruction during drying and/or mercury intrusion, while the negative value constitutes the necessary condition to state that there are no such changes. Some of our preliminary results and literature data were considered from this point of view. The comparison of respective volumes has led to the conclusion that one can assume the lack of sample structure changes during air- or oven-drying/mercury intrusion only in the case of sands.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Verification of reliability of mercury intrusion porosimetry results for natural soils by confronting a volume of pores filled with water at particular pF with volumes of corresponding pores determined by mercury porosimetry/particle density was discussed. It was stated that a positive value of the difference between the mentioned volumes constitutes the sufficient evidence of sample destruction during drying and/or mercury intrusion, while the negative value constitutes the necessary condition to state that there are no such changes. Some of our preliminary results and literature data were considered from this point of view. The comparison of respective volumes has led to the conclusion that one can assume the lack of sample structure changes during air- or oven-drying/mercury intrusion only in the case of sands.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Verification of reliability of mercury intrusion porosimetry results for natural soils by confronting a volume of pores filled with water at particular pF with volumes of corresponding pores determined by mercury porosimetry/particle density was discussed. It was stated that a positive value of the difference between the mentioned volumes constitutes the sufficient evidence of sample destruction during drying and/or mercury intrusion, while the negative value constitutes the necessary condition to state that there are no such changes. Some of our preliminary results and literature data were considered from this point of view. The comparison of respective volumes has led to the conclusion that one can assume the lack of sample structure changes during air- or oven-drying/mercury intrusion only in the case of sands.

Key concepts: Porosimetry, Mercury intrusion porosimetry, Intrusion, Mercury (programming language), Soil water, Mineralogy, Soil science, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RELIABILITY OF MERCURY INTRUSION POROSIMETRY RESULTS FOR SOILS — Research Paper | ScholarLens