1986Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Rear Battle at Corps Level: Are We Prepared?

David Crocker

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The author considers the question of whether combat service support units in a corps rear area are prepared to neutralize or defeat the Soviet rear area threat. This essay examines two deficiencies with current rear battle doctrine and proposes alternatives. The deficiencies include the use of the Rear Area Operations Center (AOC) and the combat service support units' lack of sufficient fire power and mobility for self defense. A critical assessment is made of the extensive Soviet threat to the corps rear area. The conclusion is presented that the Rear Battle doctrine is sound. However, combat service support units are in need of additional training and equipment to cope with the threat. Suggestions are given on additional ways to counter the threat.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author considers the question of whether combat service support units in a corps rear area are prepared to neutralize or defeat the Soviet rear area threat. This essay examines two deficiencies with current rear battle doctrine and proposes alternatives. The deficiencies include the use of the Rear Area Operations Center (AOC) and the combat service support units' lack of sufficient fire power and mobility for self defense. A critical assessment is made of the extensive Soviet threat to the corps rear area. The conclusion is presented that the Rear Battle doctrine is sound. However, combat service support units are in need of additional training and equipment to cope with the threat. Suggestions are given on additional ways to counter the threat.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author considers the question of whether combat service support units in a corps rear area are prepared to neutralize or defeat the Soviet rear area threat. This essay examines two deficiencies with current rear battle doctrine and proposes alternatives. The deficiencies include the use of the Rear Area Operations Center (AOC) and the combat service support units' lack of sufficient fire power and mobility for self defense. A critical assessment is made of the extensive Soviet threat to the corps rear area. The conclusion is presented that the Rear Battle doctrine is sound. However, combat service support units are in need of additional training and equipment to cope with the threat. Suggestions are given on additional ways to counter the threat.

Key concepts: Battle, Doctrine, Military doctrine, Service (business), Military service, Power (physics), Engineering, Military strategy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rear Battle at Corps Level: Are We Prepared? — Research Paper | ScholarLens