Performance comparison and analysis on MIPv6, fast MIPv6 bi-casting and Eurecom IPv6 soft handover over IEEE802.11b WLANs
Farouk Belghoul, Yan Moret, Christian Bonnet
Abstract
Farouk Belghoul, Yan Moret, Christian Bonnet
Abstract
We propose to evaluate, analyse and compare Eurecom IPv6-based soft-handover, IETF fast-MIPv6-bicasting handover and basic MIPv6 handover over IEEE 802.11 radio networks. We show through simulations that fast handover exploits layer 2/3 interactions and data duplication to reduce the overall handoff latency and packet loss. On the other hand, it introduces more layer 3 control load. Comparatively, Eurecom IPv6 soft handover for mobile IP-devices with multiple interfaces, suppresses handover latency, data loss, and is more capable in reducing average end to end delays. We identify the causes behind each handover performance and therefore devise a set of guidelines for further development of adaptive-handover-control algorithms across all-IP networks that guarantee different levels of service for applications.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We propose to evaluate, analyse and compare Eurecom IPv6-based soft-handover, IETF fast-MIPv6-bicasting handover and basic MIPv6 handover over IEEE 802.11 radio networks. We show through simulations that fast handover exploits layer 2/3 interactions and data duplication to reduce the overall handoff latency and packet loss. On the other hand, it introduces more layer 3 control load. Comparatively, Eurecom IPv6 soft handover for mobile IP-devices with multiple interfaces, suppresses handover latency, data loss, and is more capable in reducing average end to end delays. We identify the causes behind each handover performance and therefore devise a set of guidelines for further development of adaptive-handover-control algorithms across all-IP networks that guarantee different levels of service for applications.
Key concepts: Soft handover, Handover, Computer network, Mobile IP, Computer science, IPv6, Network packet, Packet loss