2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Performance comparison and analysis on MIPv6, fast MIPv6 bi-casting and Eurecom IPv6 soft handover over IEEE802.11b WLANs

Farouk Belghoul, Yan Moret, Christian Bonnet

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

We propose to evaluate, analyse and compare Eurecom IPv6-based soft-handover, IETF fast-MIPv6-bicasting handover and basic MIPv6 handover over IEEE 802.11 radio networks. We show through simulations that fast handover exploits layer 2/3 interactions and data duplication to reduce the overall handoff latency and packet loss. On the other hand, it introduces more layer 3 control load. Comparatively, Eurecom IPv6 soft handover for mobile IP-devices with multiple interfaces, suppresses handover latency, data loss, and is more capable in reducing average end to end delays. We identify the causes behind each handover performance and therefore devise a set of guidelines for further development of adaptive-handover-control algorithms across all-IP networks that guarantee different levels of service for applications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We propose to evaluate, analyse and compare Eurecom IPv6-based soft-handover, IETF fast-MIPv6-bicasting handover and basic MIPv6 handover over IEEE 802.11 radio networks. We show through simulations that fast handover exploits layer 2/3 interactions and data duplication to reduce the overall handoff latency and packet loss. On the other hand, it introduces more layer 3 control load. Comparatively, Eurecom IPv6 soft handover for mobile IP-devices with multiple interfaces, suppresses handover latency, data loss, and is more capable in reducing average end to end delays. We identify the causes behind each handover performance and therefore devise a set of guidelines for further development of adaptive-handover-control algorithms across all-IP networks that guarantee different levels of service for applications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We propose to evaluate, analyse and compare Eurecom IPv6-based soft-handover, IETF fast-MIPv6-bicasting handover and basic MIPv6 handover over IEEE 802.11 radio networks. We show through simulations that fast handover exploits layer 2/3 interactions and data duplication to reduce the overall handoff latency and packet loss. On the other hand, it introduces more layer 3 control load. Comparatively, Eurecom IPv6 soft handover for mobile IP-devices with multiple interfaces, suppresses handover latency, data loss, and is more capable in reducing average end to end delays. We identify the causes behind each handover performance and therefore devise a set of guidelines for further development of adaptive-handover-control algorithms across all-IP networks that guarantee different levels of service for applications.

Key concepts: Soft handover, Handover, Computer network, Mobile IP, Computer science, IPv6, Network packet, Packet loss

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance comparison and analysis on MIPv6, fast MIPv6 bi-casting and Eurecom IPv6 soft handover over IEEE802.11b WLANs — Research Paper | ScholarLens