Robert S. Magill
Abstract
Only 2 percent of general revenue sharing money has been allocated for social services on the municipal level. When local governments do allot some part of their revenue sharing funds for social services, the allocations vary inversely with need—but directly with the importance of organized neighborhood groups.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Only 2 percent of general revenue sharing money has been allocated for social services on the municipal level. When local governments do allot some part of their revenue sharing funds for social services, the allocations vary inversely with need—but directly with the importance of organized neighborhood groups.
Key concepts: Revenue sharing, Revenue, Business, Revenue center, Public economics, Revenue assurance, Finance, Microeconomics