Why Proportionality Matters
Youngjae Lee
Abstract
Open-access reader
Youngjae Lee
Abstract
Open-access reader
INTRODUCTION 1835 I. WHY PROPORTIONALITY? 1836 II. PROPORTIONALITY IN THE SUPREME COURT 1840 A. The Relative Culpability Test 1841 B. The Absolute Culpability Test 1843 C. The Pointless Suffering Test 1845 D. The Disjunctive Test 1847 CONCLUSION 1851
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
INTRODUCTION 1835 I. WHY PROPORTIONALITY? 1836 II. PROPORTIONALITY IN THE SUPREME COURT 1840 A. The Relative Culpability Test 1841 B. The Absolute Culpability Test 1843 C. The Pointless Suffering Test 1845 D. The Disjunctive Test 1847 CONCLUSION 1851
Key concepts: Culpability, Proportionality (law), Law, Supreme court, Test (biology), Political science, Paleontology, Biology