2012•Penn Carey Law Legal Scholarship Repository (University of Pennsylvania)Open access

Why Proportionality Matters

Youngjae Lee

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION 1835 I. WHY PROPORTIONALITY? 1836 II. PROPORTIONALITY IN THE SUPREME COURT 1840 A. The Relative Culpability Test 1841 B. The Absolute Culpability Test 1843 C. The Pointless Suffering Test 1845 D. The Disjunctive Test 1847 CONCLUSION 1851

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION 1835 I. WHY PROPORTIONALITY? 1836 II. PROPORTIONALITY IN THE SUPREME COURT 1840 A. The Relative Culpability Test 1841 B. The Absolute Culpability Test 1843 C. The Pointless Suffering Test 1845 D. The Disjunctive Test 1847 CONCLUSION 1851

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION 1835 I. WHY PROPORTIONALITY? 1836 II. PROPORTIONALITY IN THE SUPREME COURT 1840 A. The Relative Culpability Test 1841 B. The Absolute Culpability Test 1843 C. The Pointless Suffering Test 1845 D. The Disjunctive Test 1847 CONCLUSION 1851

Key concepts: Culpability, Proportionality (law), Law, Supreme court, Test (biology), Political science, Paleontology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Why Proportionality Matters — Research Paper | ScholarLens