2011•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Gangs, Crime, and Terrorism

G. David Curry

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Are terrorists like gang members? Terrorists commit crimes, primarily murder and assault. Gang members also commit crimes, including murder and assault. Gang members are more likely to commit a wider variety of crimes (Klein, 1971, 1995; Spergel, 1995). As Rosenfeld (2002, p. 1) notes, many criminologists bear only a “grudging acceptance of terrorism” as a subject of study by criminology. Gang researchers, including this author, have balked at any connection between terrorism and gang crime, because the prospect flies in the face of what we already know about gangs. In particular, there is a belief among many of us that what is most important about gangs was already said by Frederic Thrasher (1927). Research on gangs has a long academic tradition. To propose a relationship between gangs and terrorism is considered by some as an encroachment on that tradition. It turns out, however, that comparing street gangs to terrorist organizations is more promising than I had thought originally. I use the term “street gangs” as defined by Klein (1995) to refer to gangs that include both young adults and juveniles. Leaving either adults or juveniles out of the gang process distorts perceptions of gang crime. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES In “Why Criminologists Should Study Terrorism,” Rosenfeld (2002, p. 2) suggests, “It is our (criminologists') fault, our poverty of intellectual imagination prevents us from studying terrorism.” Rosenfeld argues that criminologists “blame terrorism when our theories don't fit terrorism.” He suggests that criminologists should instead blame our theories.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Are terrorists like gang members? Terrorists commit crimes, primarily murder and assault. Gang members also commit crimes, including murder and assault. Gang members are more likely to commit a wider variety of crimes (Klein, 1971, 1995; Spergel, 1995). As Rosenfeld (2002, p. 1) notes, many criminologists bear only a “grudging acceptance of terrorism” as a subject of study by criminology. Gang researchers, including this author, have balked at any connection between terrorism and gang crime, because the prospect flies in the face of what we already know about gangs. In particular, there is a belief among many of us that what is most important about gangs was already said by Frederic Thrasher (1927). Research on gangs has a long academic tradition. To propose a relationship between gangs and terrorism is considered by some as an encroachment on that tradition. It turns out, however, that comparing street gangs to terrorist organizations is more promising than I had thought originally. I use the term “street gangs” as defined by Klein (1995) to refer to gangs that include both young adults and juveniles. Leaving either adults or juveniles out of the gang process distorts perceptions of gang crime. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES In “Why Criminologists Should Study Terrorism,” Rosenfeld (2002, p. 2) suggests, “It is our (criminologists') fault, our poverty of intellectual imagination prevents us from studying terrorism.” Rosenfeld argues that criminologists “blame terrorism when our theories don't fit terrorism.” He suggests that criminologists should instead blame our theories.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Are terrorists like gang members? Terrorists commit crimes, primarily murder and assault. Gang members also commit crimes, including murder and assault. Gang members are more likely to commit a wider variety of crimes (Klein, 1971, 1995; Spergel, 1995). As Rosenfeld (2002, p. 1) notes, many criminologists bear only a “grudging acceptance of terrorism” as a subject of study by criminology. Gang researchers, including this author, have balked at any connection between terrorism and gang crime, because the prospect flies in the face of what we already know about gangs. In particular, there is a belief among many of us that what is most important about gangs was already said by Frederic Thrasher (1927). Research on gangs has a long academic tradition. To propose a relationship between gangs and terrorism is considered by some as an encroachment on that tradition. It turns out, however, that comparing street gangs to terrorist organizations is more promising than I had thought originally. I use the term “street gangs” as defined by Klein (1995) to refer to gangs that include both young adults and juveniles. Leaving either adults or juveniles out of the gang process distorts perceptions of gang crime. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES In “Why Criminologists Should Study Terrorism,” Rosenfeld (2002, p. 2) suggests, “It is our (criminologists') fault, our poverty of intellectual imagination prevents us from studying terrorism.” Rosenfeld argues that criminologists “blame terrorism when our theories don't fit terrorism.” He suggests that criminologists should instead blame our theories.

Key concepts: Commit, Criminology, Terrorism, Subject (documents), Organised crime, Variety (cybernetics), Face (sociological concept), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gangs, Crime, and Terrorism — Research Paper | ScholarLens