1992•OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Non-destructive assay techniques and associated measurement uncertainties

S.T. Hsue, Thomas E. Sampson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

To calculate the inventory differences for a facility or process, we should have random error and bias estimates for all the measurement systems in addition to the measurement results on each sample. For non-destructive assay (NDA) instruments, the assignment of these measurement errors is quite complex. This paper discusses the random and bias estimates of two NDA systems, one measuring homogeneous samples and the other measuring heterogeneous waste samples. Actual measurement data are used to illustrate the error estimates. The entire measurement system/material category combination must be examined to accurately assess measurement uncertainty for each measured item. Such an assessment might start with an error matrix for each instrument/material category combination as shown in this paper, in which many sources of error are considered. Only then can the random error and bias for measurements from the system be assigned.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To calculate the inventory differences for a facility or process, we should have random error and bias estimates for all the measurement systems in addition to the measurement results on each sample. For non-destructive assay (NDA) instruments, the assignment of these measurement errors is quite complex. This paper discusses the random and bias estimates of two NDA systems, one measuring homogeneous samples and the other measuring heterogeneous waste samples. Actual measurement data are used to illustrate the error estimates. The entire measurement system/material category combination must be examined to accurately assess measurement uncertainty for each measured item. Such an assessment might start with an error matrix for each instrument/material category combination as shown in this paper, in which many sources of error are considered. Only then can the random error and bias for measurements from the system be assigned.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To calculate the inventory differences for a facility or process, we should have random error and bias estimates for all the measurement systems in addition to the measurement results on each sample. For non-destructive assay (NDA) instruments, the assignment of these measurement errors is quite complex. This paper discusses the random and bias estimates of two NDA systems, one measuring homogeneous samples and the other measuring heterogeneous waste samples. Actual measurement data are used to illustrate the error estimates. The entire measurement system/material category combination must be examined to accurately assess measurement uncertainty for each measured item. Such an assessment might start with an error matrix for each instrument/material category combination as shown in this paper, in which many sources of error are considered. Only then can the random error and bias for measurements from the system be assigned.

Key concepts: Observational error, Measurement uncertainty, Random error, System of measurement, Statistics, Non-sampling error, Computer science, Matrix (chemical analysis)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-destructive assay techniques and associated measurement uncertainties — Research Paper | ScholarLens