2011•Journal of DentistryRequires access

The Effect of Chamfer and Shoulder Marginal Designs on the Fracture Resistance of all Ceramic Restorations, Inceram

Ezatollah Jalalian, Najmeh Aletaha

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Statement of Problem: One of the major problems of the all ceramic restorations is their probable fracture against the occlusal force. However, there is not enough information about fracture resistance of all the ceramic crowns in different finishing lines. Purpose: The aim of present in-vitro study was to compare the effect of two marginal designs (shoulder and chamfer) on the fracture resistance of all ceramic restorations, Inceram. Methods and Material: On an extracted caries–free first maxillary premolar a 50-degree chamfer margin (0.7 mm) was prepared. Ten impressions were taken using a polyvinylsiloxane. The impressions were poured with epoxy resin to fabricate the dies. The same tooth was retrieved and the 50-degree chamfer was converted into a 90-degree shoulder margin (1mm). Ten impressions were prepared and 10 more epoxy resin dies were fabricated. The impressions of each epoxy resin die were taken using polyvinylsiloxane impression material and poured with die stone. Alumina cores with a thicknes of 0.5mm were fabricated on the stone dies in a dental laboratory. The alumina cores were then cemented with panavia on the epoxy resin dies and underwent a fracture test with a universal testing machine. The samples were then investigated regarding the origin of the failue. The statistical analysis was done using T-test. Result: The mean value of the fracture resistance for the chamfer samples was 610.18±58.79 N and that of the shoulder samples was 502.72±105.83 N. The student's T-test revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups ( p <0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate a relationship between the marginal design and fracture resistance. A chamfer margin could improve the biomechanical performance of the posterior single crown alumina restorations. This might be due to  the strong unity in the chamfer margin. Key words: Shoulder, Chamfer, Fracture resistance, All ceramic, Inceram

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Statement of Problem: One of the major problems of the all ceramic restorations is their probable fracture against the occlusal force. However, there is not enough information about fracture resistance of all the ceramic crowns in different finishing lines. Purpose: The aim of present in-vitro study was to compare the effect of two marginal designs (shoulder and chamfer) on the fracture resistance of all ceramic restorations, Inceram. Methods and Material: On an extracted caries–free first maxillary premolar a 50-degree chamfer margin (0.7 mm) was prepared. Ten impressions were taken using a polyvinylsiloxane. The impressions were poured with epoxy resin to fabricate the dies. The same tooth was retrieved and the 50-degree chamfer was converted into a 90-degree shoulder margin (1mm). Ten impressions were prepared and 10 more epoxy resin dies were fabricated. The impressions of each epoxy resin die were taken using polyvinylsiloxane impression material and poured with die stone. Alumina cores with a thicknes of 0.5mm were fabricated on the stone dies in a dental laboratory. The alumina cores were then cemented with panavia on the epoxy resin dies and underwent a fracture test with a universal testing machine. The samples were then investigated regarding the origin of the failue. The statistical analysis was done using T-test. Result: The mean value of the fracture resistance for the chamfer samples was 610.18±58.79 N and that of the shoulder samples was 502.72±105.83 N. The student's T-test revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups ( p <0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate a relationship between the marginal design and fracture resistance. A chamfer margin could improve the biomechanical performance of the posterior single crown alumina restorations. This might be due to  the strong unity in the chamfer margin. Key words: Shoulder, Chamfer, Fracture resistance, All ceramic, Inceram

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Statement of Problem: One of the major problems of the all ceramic restorations is their probable fracture against the occlusal force. However, there is not enough information about fracture resistance of all the ceramic crowns in different finishing lines. Purpose: The aim of present in-vitro study was to compare the effect of two marginal designs (shoulder and chamfer) on the fracture resistance of all ceramic restorations, Inceram. Methods and Material: On an extracted caries–free first maxillary premolar a 50-degree chamfer margin (0.7 mm) was prepared. Ten impressions were taken using a polyvinylsiloxane. The impressions were poured with epoxy resin to fabricate the dies. The same tooth was retrieved and the 50-degree chamfer was converted into a 90-degree shoulder margin (1mm). Ten impressions were prepared and 10 more epoxy resin dies were fabricated. The impressions of each epoxy resin die were taken using polyvinylsiloxane impression material and poured with die stone. Alumina cores with a thicknes of 0.5mm were fabricated on the stone dies in a dental laboratory. The alumina cores were then cemented with panavia on the epoxy resin dies and underwent a fracture test with a universal testing machine. The samples were then investigated regarding the origin of the failue. The statistical analysis was done using T-test. Result: The mean value of the fracture resistance for the chamfer samples was 610.18±58.79 N and that of the shoulder samples was 502.72±105.83 N. The student's T-test revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups ( p <0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate a relationship between the marginal design and fracture resistance. A chamfer margin could improve the biomechanical performance of the posterior single crown alumina restorations. This might be due to  the strong unity in the chamfer margin. Key words: Shoulder, Chamfer, Fracture resistance, All ceramic, Inceram

Key concepts: Chamfer (geometry), Materials science, Epoxy, Fracture (geology), Universal testing machine, Finish line, Ceramic, Composite material

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effect of Chamfer and Shoulder Marginal Designs on the Fracture Resistance of all Ceramic Restorations, Inceram — Research Paper | ScholarLens