2011Journal of Ultrasound in MedicineRequires access

Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

Ji Hye Min, Min Woo Lee, Hyunchul Rhim, Dongil Choi, Young-Sun Kim, Young Jun Kim, Dong Ik, Hyo Keun Lim

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the sonographic findings of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and to determine how often the lesion conspicuity of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma makes it suitable for percutaneous sonographically guided radio frequency ablation. METHODS: A radiologist prospectively classified the echogenicity of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas compared to that of the surrounding liver. In addition, the margin of the tumor was classified as follows: grade 1, absolutely indistinguishable; grade 2, less than 50%; grade 3, greater than 50%; and grade 4, clearly demarcated. The lesion conspicuity was also classified as follows: grade 1, absolutely invisible, thus ineligible for percutaneous sonographically guided radio frequency ablation; grade 2, poorly visible, thus unsuitable for ablation; and grade 3, visible and conspicuous, thus suitable for ablation. RESULTS: A total of 37 consecutive patients (31 men and 6 women; mean age, 59.4 years) with 38 hepatocellular carcinomas were enrolled. The echogenicity of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas varied, with the most common finding being a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion (31.6%), followed by an isoechoic lesion (23.7%), a heterogeneous hyperechoic lesion (18.4%), a homogeneous hypoechoic lesion (13.2%), a lesion with a hypoechoic halo (10.5%), and a homogeneous hyperechoic lesion (2.7%). The margin of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas was clearly demarcated in only 28.9% of tumors, whereas 23.7% of the tumors were absolutely indistinguishable from the surrounding liver. The lesion conspicuity was classified as grade 3 in only 60.5% of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The echogenicity and margins of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization varied. The lesion conspicuity was suitable for sonographically guided radio frequency ablation in only 60.5% of cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the sonographic findings of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and to determine how often the lesion conspicuity of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma makes it suitable for percutaneous sonographically guided radio frequency ablation. METHODS: A radiologist prospectively classified the echogenicity of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas compared to that of the surrounding liver. In addition, the margin of the tumor was classified as follows: grade 1, absolutely indistinguishable; grade 2, less than 50%; grade 3, greater than 50%; and grade 4, clearly demarcated. The lesion conspicuity was also classified as follows: grade 1, absolutely invisible, thus ineligible for percutaneous sonographically guided radio frequency ablation; grade 2, poorly visible, thus unsuitable for ablation; and grade 3, visible and conspicuous, thus suitable for ablation. RESULTS: A total of 37 consecutive patients (31 men and 6 women; mean age, 59.4 years) with 38 hepatocellular carcinomas were enrolled. The echogenicity of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas varied, with the most common finding being a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion (31.6%), followed by an isoechoic lesion (23.7%), a heterogeneous hyperechoic lesion (18.4%), a homogeneous hypoechoic lesion (13.2%), a lesion with a hypoechoic halo (10.5%), and a homogeneous hyperechoic lesion (2.7%). The margin of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas was clearly demarcated in only 28.9% of tumors, whereas 23.7% of the tumors were absolutely indistinguishable from the surrounding liver. The lesion conspicuity was classified as grade 3 in only 60.5% of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The echogenicity and margins of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization varied. The lesion conspicuity was suitable for sonographically guided radio frequency ablation in only 60.5% of cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the sonographic findings of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and to determine how often the lesion conspicuity of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma makes it suitable for percutaneous sonographically guided radio frequency ablation. METHODS: A radiologist prospectively classified the echogenicity of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas compared to that of the surrounding liver. In addition, the margin of the tumor was classified as follows: grade 1, absolutely indistinguishable; grade 2, less than 50%; grade 3, greater than 50%; and grade 4, clearly demarcated. The lesion conspicuity was also classified as follows: grade 1, absolutely invisible, thus ineligible for percutaneous sonographically guided radio frequency ablation; grade 2, poorly visible, thus unsuitable for ablation; and grade 3, visible and conspicuous, thus suitable for ablation. RESULTS: A total of 37 consecutive patients (31 men and 6 women; mean age, 59.4 years) with 38 hepatocellular carcinomas were enrolled. The echogenicity of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas varied, with the most common finding being a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion (31.6%), followed by an isoechoic lesion (23.7%), a heterogeneous hyperechoic lesion (18.4%), a homogeneous hypoechoic lesion (13.2%), a lesion with a hypoechoic halo (10.5%), and a homogeneous hyperechoic lesion (2.7%). The margin of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas was clearly demarcated in only 28.9% of tumors, whereas 23.7% of the tumors were absolutely indistinguishable from the surrounding liver. The lesion conspicuity was classified as grade 3 in only 60.5% of the recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The echogenicity and margins of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization varied. The lesion conspicuity was suitable for sonographically guided radio frequency ablation in only 60.5% of cases.

Key concepts: Medicine, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Carcinoma, Radiology, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization — Research Paper | ScholarLens