2011TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCESOpen access

Nitrous oxide anesthesia in children for MRI: a comparison with isoflurane and halothane

MEHMET EMİN ORHAN, Ferruh Bilgin, Oğuz Kılıçkaya, Abdülkadir Atım, Ercan Kurt

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

To compare the anesthetic effects of nitrous oxide, isoflurane, and halothane on hemodynamic stability and recovery characteristics in pediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and methods: The present study includes 60 ASA I-II children aged 1-12 years undergoing MRI. After endotracheal intubation, patients were randomly assigned into 1 of 3 anesthetic groups. Group N (n = 20) received nitrous oxide and oxygen (N_2O:O_2 60:40), Group I (n = 20) received 0.5% isoflurane and oxygen, Group H (n = 20) received 0.5% halothane and oxygen to maintain anesthesia. At the completion of the procedure, inhalation anesthetic was discontinued. Extubation, emergence, recovery times, and adverse events were recorded throughout the duration of the procedure. Results: There was no significant difference in the demographic data among the groups. In the nitrous oxide group 5 children (25%), in the halothane group 2 children (10%), and in the isoflurane group 1 child (5%) moved during MRI and supplemental inhalation anesthesia was required for these patients. Emergence time after nitrous oxide anesthesia was slightly shorter than after isoflurane anesthesia (3.15 ± 2.56 min compared with 4.65 ± 2.64 min, P = 0.162) but significantly shorter than after halothane anesthesia (5.35 ± 2.47 min, P = 0.023). Early recovery time after nitrous oxide and isoflurane anesthesia was significantly more rapid than after halothane anesthesia (4.60 ± 2.58 min and 3.65 ± 1.63 min compared with 7.00 ± 2.15 min, P < 0.05). Conclusion: After induction with propofol, nitrous oxide may provide anesthesia for MRI in pre-medicated children. However, complete immobility was not achieved in all patients with nitrous oxide alone. Nitrous oxide and isoflurane resulted in faster emergence and recovery than halothane, but there was no significant difference between nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Discharge times from the hospital were similar for all 3 groups.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To compare the anesthetic effects of nitrous oxide, isoflurane, and halothane on hemodynamic stability and recovery characteristics in pediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and methods: The present study includes 60 ASA I-II children aged 1-12 years undergoing MRI. After endotracheal intubation, patients were randomly assigned into 1 of 3 anesthetic groups. Group N (n = 20) received nitrous oxide and oxygen (N_2O:O_2 60:40), Group I (n = 20) received 0.5% isoflurane and oxygen, Group H (n = 20) received 0.5% halothane and oxygen to maintain anesthesia. At the completion of the procedure, inhalation anesthetic was discontinued. Extubation, emergence, recovery times, and adverse events were recorded throughout the duration of the procedure. Results: There was no significant difference in the demographic data among the groups. In the nitrous oxide group 5 children (25%), in the halothane group 2 children (10%), and in the isoflurane group 1 child (5%) moved during MRI and supplemental inhalation anesthesia was required for these patients. Emergence time after nitrous oxide anesthesia was slightly shorter than after isoflurane anesthesia (3.15 ± 2.56 min compared with 4.65 ± 2.64 min, P = 0.162) but significantly shorter than after halothane anesthesia (5.35 ± 2.47 min, P = 0.023). Early recovery time after nitrous oxide and isoflurane anesthesia was significantly more rapid than after halothane anesthesia (4.60 ± 2.58 min and 3.65 ± 1.63 min compared with 7.00 ± 2.15 min, P < 0.05). Conclusion: After induction with propofol, nitrous oxide may provide anesthesia for MRI in pre-medicated children. However, complete immobility was not achieved in all patients with nitrous oxide alone. Nitrous oxide and isoflurane resulted in faster emergence and recovery than halothane, but there was no significant difference between nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Discharge times from the hospital were similar for all 3 groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To compare the anesthetic effects of nitrous oxide, isoflurane, and halothane on hemodynamic stability and recovery characteristics in pediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and methods: The present study includes 60 ASA I-II children aged 1-12 years undergoing MRI. After endotracheal intubation, patients were randomly assigned into 1 of 3 anesthetic groups. Group N (n = 20) received nitrous oxide and oxygen (N_2O:O_2 60:40), Group I (n = 20) received 0.5% isoflurane and oxygen, Group H (n = 20) received 0.5% halothane and oxygen to maintain anesthesia. At the completion of the procedure, inhalation anesthetic was discontinued. Extubation, emergence, recovery times, and adverse events were recorded throughout the duration of the procedure. Results: There was no significant difference in the demographic data among the groups. In the nitrous oxide group 5 children (25%), in the halothane group 2 children (10%), and in the isoflurane group 1 child (5%) moved during MRI and supplemental inhalation anesthesia was required for these patients. Emergence time after nitrous oxide anesthesia was slightly shorter than after isoflurane anesthesia (3.15 ± 2.56 min compared with 4.65 ± 2.64 min, P = 0.162) but significantly shorter than after halothane anesthesia (5.35 ± 2.47 min, P = 0.023). Early recovery time after nitrous oxide and isoflurane anesthesia was significantly more rapid than after halothane anesthesia (4.60 ± 2.58 min and 3.65 ± 1.63 min compared with 7.00 ± 2.15 min, P < 0.05). Conclusion: After induction with propofol, nitrous oxide may provide anesthesia for MRI in pre-medicated children. However, complete immobility was not achieved in all patients with nitrous oxide alone. Nitrous oxide and isoflurane resulted in faster emergence and recovery than halothane, but there was no significant difference between nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Discharge times from the hospital were similar for all 3 groups.

Key concepts: Isoflurane, Nitrous oxide, Halothane, Anesthesia, Anesthetic, Inhalation, Medicine, Propofol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nitrous oxide anesthesia in children for MRI: a comparison with isoflurane and halothane — Research Paper | ScholarLens