1982•UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)Open access

Reducing the cost of water-pollution control under the Clean Water Act

M. Rothfelder

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The present water-pollution-regulation system focuses on treatment by the individual and ignores the aggregate cost of pollution control. Economists have proposed three methods to create pollution-control systems that cost less than the present one: effluent charges, marketable effluent permits, and private ownership of the waterway. Of these methods, only the marketable permit system has any potential for use within the Clean Water Act. Under the Act the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could not implement an initial sale of such permits, but a state administering its own permit system could. Either agency could allow transfer of permits after issuance if upon each transfer they required the procedural safeguards required by the Act. Requiring the safeguards would, however, diminish the system's ability to lower pollution-control costs. Whether an agency could allow transfer without the safeguards is unclear, but an EPA regulation allowing transfers under just one of the safeguards probably could not withstand a court challenge. 104 references.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The present water-pollution-regulation system focuses on treatment by the individual and ignores the aggregate cost of pollution control. Economists have proposed three methods to create pollution-control systems that cost less than the present one: effluent charges, marketable effluent permits, and private ownership of the waterway. Of these methods, only the marketable permit system has any potential for use within the Clean Water Act. Under the Act the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could not implement an initial sale of such permits, but a state administering its own permit system could. Either agency could allow transfer of permits after issuance if upon each transfer they required the procedural safeguards required by the Act. Requiring the safeguards would, however, diminish the system's ability to lower pollution-control costs. Whether an agency could allow transfer without the safeguards is unclear, but an EPA regulation allowing transfers under just one of the safeguards probably could not withstand a court challenge. 104 references.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The present water-pollution-regulation system focuses on treatment by the individual and ignores the aggregate cost of pollution control. Economists have proposed three methods to create pollution-control systems that cost less than the present one: effluent charges, marketable effluent permits, and private ownership of the waterway. Of these methods, only the marketable permit system has any potential for use within the Clean Water Act. Under the Act the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could not implement an initial sale of such permits, but a state administering its own permit system could. Either agency could allow transfer of permits after issuance if upon each transfer they required the procedural safeguards required by the Act. Requiring the safeguards would, however, diminish the system's ability to lower pollution-control costs. Whether an agency could allow transfer without the safeguards is unclear, but an EPA regulation allowing transfers under just one of the safeguards probably could not withstand a court challenge. 104 references.

Key concepts: Agency (philosophy), Clean Water Act, Pollution, Control (management), Business, Effluent, United States regulation of point source water pollution, Water pollution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reducing the cost of water-pollution control under the Clean Water Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens