2003The University of QueenslandRequires access

The contestability of the Australian airline industry.

David Bailey

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This thesis discusses the contestability theory with application to the Australian airline industry. Initially, it was assumed that an airline industry was an example of a contestable market. That is, the criteria outlined for a contestable market were satisfied by a given city pair. However, post deregulation experience in Australia and the U.S. has suggested that these criteria do not hold for a variety of reasons. This thesis analyses the Australian domestic airline industry and the subsequent entry and exit of a number of airlines. The reasons that contestability is not satisfied include a combination of both natural and industry created barriers to entry. An analysis of prices during this period reveals that the trends evident are not consistent with the contestability theory and are more accurately described by a limit pricing model. This analysis of the criteria required to fulfil contestability indicates that the Australian domestic airline industry is not a contestable market.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis discusses the contestability theory with application to the Australian airline industry. Initially, it was assumed that an airline industry was an example of a contestable market. That is, the criteria outlined for a contestable market were satisfied by a given city pair. However, post deregulation experience in Australia and the U.S. has suggested that these criteria do not hold for a variety of reasons. This thesis analyses the Australian domestic airline industry and the subsequent entry and exit of a number of airlines. The reasons that contestability is not satisfied include a combination of both natural and industry created barriers to entry. An analysis of prices during this period reveals that the trends evident are not consistent with the contestability theory and are more accurately described by a limit pricing model. This analysis of the criteria required to fulfil contestability indicates that the Australian domestic airline industry is not a contestable market.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis discusses the contestability theory with application to the Australian airline industry. Initially, it was assumed that an airline industry was an example of a contestable market. That is, the criteria outlined for a contestable market were satisfied by a given city pair. However, post deregulation experience in Australia and the U.S. has suggested that these criteria do not hold for a variety of reasons. This thesis analyses the Australian domestic airline industry and the subsequent entry and exit of a number of airlines. The reasons that contestability is not satisfied include a combination of both natural and industry created barriers to entry. An analysis of prices during this period reveals that the trends evident are not consistent with the contestability theory and are more accurately described by a limit pricing model. This analysis of the criteria required to fulfil contestability indicates that the Australian domestic airline industry is not a contestable market.

Key concepts: Deregulation, Business, Variety (cybernetics), Industrial organization, Air transport, Market analysis, Marketing, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The contestability of the Australian airline industry. — Research Paper | ScholarLens