2011The Indonesian Journal of Accounting ResearchRequires access

Real and Accrual-Based Earnings Management: Can A Qualified Auditor Detect It?

Dwi Ratmono

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This study examines whether management of public companies in Indonesia engage real earnings management to meet earnings benchmarks. This paper documents evidence consistent with firms  committing real earnings management around earnings threshold for poor performing firms. Manager opportunistically utilize price discounts to temporarily increase sales, overproduction to report lower cost of goods sold, and reduction of discretionary expenditures to improve reported margins. Consistent with the conjecture of Roychowdhury (2006) and Cohen & Zarowin (2010) auditors find it more difficult to detect real earnings management than accrual-based earnings management. The results of this study indicate that drawing inferences about earnings management by analyzing only accrual manipulation is inappropriate. This study contributes to the accounting literature by presenting evidence on the real earnings management, which has received relatively little attention to date.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines whether management of public companies in Indonesia engage real earnings management to meet earnings benchmarks. This paper documents evidence consistent with firms  committing real earnings management around earnings threshold for poor performing firms. Manager opportunistically utilize price discounts to temporarily increase sales, overproduction to report lower cost of goods sold, and reduction of discretionary expenditures to improve reported margins. Consistent with the conjecture of Roychowdhury (2006) and Cohen & Zarowin (2010) auditors find it more difficult to detect real earnings management than accrual-based earnings management. The results of this study indicate that drawing inferences about earnings management by analyzing only accrual manipulation is inappropriate. This study contributes to the accounting literature by presenting evidence on the real earnings management, which has received relatively little attention to date.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines whether management of public companies in Indonesia engage real earnings management to meet earnings benchmarks. This paper documents evidence consistent with firms  committing real earnings management around earnings threshold for poor performing firms. Manager opportunistically utilize price discounts to temporarily increase sales, overproduction to report lower cost of goods sold, and reduction of discretionary expenditures to improve reported margins. Consistent with the conjecture of Roychowdhury (2006) and Cohen & Zarowin (2010) auditors find it more difficult to detect real earnings management than accrual-based earnings management. The results of this study indicate that drawing inferences about earnings management by analyzing only accrual manipulation is inappropriate. This study contributes to the accounting literature by presenting evidence on the real earnings management, which has received relatively little attention to date.

Key concepts: Earnings management, Accrual, Audit, Business, Accounting, Earnings, Earnings response coefficient, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Real and Accrual-Based Earnings Management: Can A Qualified Auditor Detect It? — Research Paper | ScholarLens