1986•Socio-Environmental Systems ModelingOpen access

A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe. I. Subgenus Inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe

Th.W. Kuyper

Open full text 75 citations

Abstract

Fries (1821: 11) established Agaricus series Derminus tribus Inocybe, which was later elevated by him to generic rank (Fries, 1863: 346). Originally Fries based his circumscription of Inocybe solely on macroscopical characters; when it was raised to generic status Fries added that the spores of all Inocybe species were seemingly rough (’sporae scabrae videntur omnibus Inocybis communes’). Almost certainly this was not based on original observation, as Fries considered the use of the microscope unnecessary, but the result of an uncritical appraisal of observations by Berkeley (1860). The relevance of Fries’s statement regarding the typification of Inocybe is discussed on p. 29.\nAlthough the genus Inocybe is easily recognisable by macroscopical characters, judging from the fact that the generic concept has scarcely changed to the present day, the delimitation of species is considerably more difficult. The number of species increased continually from 1821 onwards. Massee (1904) published a world monograph of the genus but his work unfortunately lacks precision and it is moreover outdated. Important regional work on the genus has been carried out by Heim (1931) and Kühner (in Kühner & Romagnesi, 1953) in France; Alessio (1980) in Italy; Enderle & Stangl (1981) and Stangl & Enderle (1983) in Germany; Kauffman (1924), Stuntz (1947, 1954), and Grund & Stuntz (1968, 1970, 1975, 1977, 1980, 1981, 1983, 1984) in North America; and Horak (1978, 1979, 1980, 1981) in Australia and Asia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fries (1821: 11) established Agaricus series Derminus tribus Inocybe, which was later elevated by him to generic rank (Fries, 1863: 346). Originally Fries based his circumscription of Inocybe solely on macroscopical characters; when it was raised to generic status Fries added that the spores of all Inocybe species were seemingly rough (’sporae scabrae videntur omnibus Inocybis communes’). Almost certainly this was not based on original observation, as Fries considered the use of the microscope unnecessary, but the result of an uncritical appraisal of observations by Berkeley (1860). The relevance of Fries’s statement regarding the typification of Inocybe is discussed on p. 29.\nAlthough the genus Inocybe is easily recognisable by macroscopical characters, judging from the fact that the generic concept has scarcely changed to the present day, the delimitation of species is considerably more difficult. The number of species increased continually from 1821 onwards. Massee (1904) published a world monograph of the genus but his work unfortunately lacks precision and it is moreover outdated. Important regional work on the genus has been carried out by Heim (1931) and Kühner (in Kühner & Romagnesi, 1953) in France; Alessio (1980) in Italy; Enderle & Stangl (1981) and Stangl & Enderle (1983) in Germany; Kauffman (1924), Stuntz (1947, 1954), and Grund & Stuntz (1968, 1970, 1975, 1977, 1980, 1981, 1983, 1984) in North America; and Horak (1978, 1979, 1980, 1981) in Australia and Asia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 75 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fries (1821: 11) established Agaricus series Derminus tribus Inocybe, which was later elevated by him to generic rank (Fries, 1863: 346). Originally Fries based his circumscription of Inocybe solely on macroscopical characters; when it was raised to generic status Fries added that the spores of all Inocybe species were seemingly rough (’sporae scabrae videntur omnibus Inocybis communes’). Almost certainly this was not based on original observation, as Fries considered the use of the microscope unnecessary, but the result of an uncritical appraisal of observations by Berkeley (1860). The relevance of Fries’s statement regarding the typification of Inocybe is discussed on p. 29.\nAlthough the genus Inocybe is easily recognisable by macroscopical characters, judging from the fact that the generic concept has scarcely changed to the present day, the delimitation of species is considerably more difficult. The number of species increased continually from 1821 onwards. Massee (1904) published a world monograph of the genus but his work unfortunately lacks precision and it is moreover outdated. Important regional work on the genus has been carried out by Heim (1931) and Kühner (in Kühner & Romagnesi, 1953) in France; Alessio (1980) in Italy; Enderle & Stangl (1981) and Stangl & Enderle (1983) in Germany; Kauffman (1924), Stuntz (1947, 1954), and Grund & Stuntz (1968, 1970, 1975, 1977, 1980, 1981, 1983, 1984) in North America; and Horak (1978, 1979, 1980, 1981) in Australia and Asia.

Key concepts: Subgenus, Genus, Zoology, Biology, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe. I. Subgenus Inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe — Research Paper | ScholarLens