2010•AnalysisRequires access

The Idea of Justice * By AMARTYA SEN

Peter Lloyd Vallentyne

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Amartya Sen, who was awarded the Nobel prize in economics in 1998 for his work on welfare economics, has had a major impact on moral and political philosophy. Although trained as an economist, he has had ‘a love affair with philosophy’ and made significant contributions to our understanding of poverty, wellbeing, rights, liberty and equality. Along with Martha Nussbaum, he has developed and defended the view that justice is centred on the development of capabilities, rather than happiness, primary goods, or resources. The present book brings together many of the grand themes of his work. Although the book focuses on justice, Sen briefly addresses the issue of rationality. He rightly argues that rationality does not require an exclusive focus on the advancement of one’s own wellbeing (even after factoring in the effect of sympathy for others on one’s wellbeing). Agents typically have goals other than advancing their own wellbeing. Moreover – but much more controversially – rationality, he argues, also allows sacrificing one’s goals in order to respect one’s ‘commitments’ (e.g. to respect other people’s goals), even if they are not part of one’s goals. These issues are explored in much more depth in his Rationality and Freedom.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Amartya Sen, who was awarded the Nobel prize in economics in 1998 for his work on welfare economics, has had a major impact on moral and political philosophy. Although trained as an economist, he has had ‘a love affair with philosophy’ and made significant contributions to our understanding of poverty, wellbeing, rights, liberty and equality. Along with Martha Nussbaum, he has developed and defended the view that justice is centred on the development of capabilities, rather than happiness, primary goods, or resources. The present book brings together many of the grand themes of his work. Although the book focuses on justice, Sen briefly addresses the issue of rationality. He rightly argues that rationality does not require an exclusive focus on the advancement of one’s own wellbeing (even after factoring in the effect of sympathy for others on one’s wellbeing). Agents typically have goals other than advancing their own wellbeing. Moreover – but much more controversially – rationality, he argues, also allows sacrificing one’s goals in order to respect one’s ‘commitments’ (e.g. to respect other people’s goals), even if they are not part of one’s goals. These issues are explored in much more depth in his Rationality and Freedom.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Amartya Sen, who was awarded the Nobel prize in economics in 1998 for his work on welfare economics, has had a major impact on moral and political philosophy. Although trained as an economist, he has had ‘a love affair with philosophy’ and made significant contributions to our understanding of poverty, wellbeing, rights, liberty and equality. Along with Martha Nussbaum, he has developed and defended the view that justice is centred on the development of capabilities, rather than happiness, primary goods, or resources. The present book brings together many of the grand themes of his work. Although the book focuses on justice, Sen briefly addresses the issue of rationality. He rightly argues that rationality does not require an exclusive focus on the advancement of one’s own wellbeing (even after factoring in the effect of sympathy for others on one’s wellbeing). Agents typically have goals other than advancing their own wellbeing. Moreover – but much more controversially – rationality, he argues, also allows sacrificing one’s goals in order to respect one’s ‘commitments’ (e.g. to respect other people’s goals), even if they are not part of one’s goals. These issues are explored in much more depth in his Rationality and Freedom.

Key concepts: Economic Justice, Sociology, Epistemology, Philosophy, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Idea of Justice * By AMARTYA SEN — Research Paper | ScholarLens