2015Journal of International PeacekeepingRequires access

Sexual Exploitation and Abuse on Peacekeeping Operations

Athena Nguyen

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse (sea) have been made against many United Nations (un) peacekeeping operations. Whilst it may be argued that the un should be held responsible for these violations, establishing the responsibility of the un under international law is not straight forward. This article will examine the extent to which the responsibility of the un can be established for sea on its peacekeeping operations. This article will begin by considering the status of the un as an international legal person and its legal rights and responsibilities. Then, the sources of law for the responsibility of international organisations will be discussed, including prohibitions against sea and the obligations that these prohibitions may create for the un. In particular, the Articles on the Responsibilities of International Organizations (ario) will be examined and the application of the ario to the case of sea on peacekeeping operations will be explored. It will be concluded that the international law in this area is far from settled and, hence, many challenges remain in being able to establish the un’s responsibility for acts of sea on its peacekeeping operations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse (sea) have been made against many United Nations (un) peacekeeping operations. Whilst it may be argued that the un should be held responsible for these violations, establishing the responsibility of the un under international law is not straight forward. This article will examine the extent to which the responsibility of the un can be established for sea on its peacekeeping operations. This article will begin by considering the status of the un as an international legal person and its legal rights and responsibilities. Then, the sources of law for the responsibility of international organisations will be discussed, including prohibitions against sea and the obligations that these prohibitions may create for the un. In particular, the Articles on the Responsibilities of International Organizations (ario) will be examined and the application of the ario to the case of sea on peacekeeping operations will be explored. It will be concluded that the international law in this area is far from settled and, hence, many challenges remain in being able to establish the un’s responsibility for acts of sea on its peacekeeping operations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse (sea) have been made against many United Nations (un) peacekeeping operations. Whilst it may be argued that the un should be held responsible for these violations, establishing the responsibility of the un under international law is not straight forward. This article will examine the extent to which the responsibility of the un can be established for sea on its peacekeeping operations. This article will begin by considering the status of the un as an international legal person and its legal rights and responsibilities. Then, the sources of law for the responsibility of international organisations will be discussed, including prohibitions against sea and the obligations that these prohibitions may create for the un. In particular, the Articles on the Responsibilities of International Organizations (ario) will be examined and the application of the ario to the case of sea on peacekeeping operations will be explored. It will be concluded that the international law in this area is far from settled and, hence, many challenges remain in being able to establish the un’s responsibility for acts of sea on its peacekeeping operations.

Key concepts: Peacekeeping, International law, Political science, Law, Responsibility to protect, Public international law, International relations, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sexual Exploitation and Abuse on Peacekeeping Operations — Research Paper | ScholarLens