2011PubMedRequires access

Fractionated irradiation of five human lung cancer cell lines and prediction of survival according to a radiobiology model.

Mattias Hedman, Michael Bergqvist, Daniel Brattström, Ola Brodin

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates a predictive radiobiology model by measurements of surviving fraction (SF) by the clonogenic assay or the extrapolation method and the proliferation rate in vitro. It is hypothesized that incorporating proliferation to intrinsic radiosensitivity, measured by SF, to predict radiation responsiveness after fractionated irradiation adds to the model's accuracy. Materials and Methods. Five lung cancer cell lines with known SF after 1 Gy (SF1), and also SF2 and SF5, were irradiated with three different fractionation regimes; 10 × 1 Gy, 5 × 2 Gy or 2 × 5 Gy during the same total time to achieve empirical SF. In addition, the SF1, SF2 and SF5 after fractionated irradiation was calculated for each cell line based on the already known single fraction SF and with or without a proliferation factor. The results were compared to the empirical data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: By using the clonogenic assay to measure radiosensitivity, prediction of radiosensitivity was improved after fractionated radiotherapy when proliferation was used in the radiobiology model. However, this was not the case in the cell lines where the extrapolation method was used to calculate SF. Thus, a radiobiology model including intrinsic radiosensitivity, measured by the clonogenic assay, as well as proliferation, is better at predicting survival after fractionated radiotherapy, compared to the use of intrinsic radiosensitivity alone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates a predictive radiobiology model by measurements of surviving fraction (SF) by the clonogenic assay or the extrapolation method and the proliferation rate in vitro. It is hypothesized that incorporating proliferation to intrinsic radiosensitivity, measured by SF, to predict radiation responsiveness after fractionated irradiation adds to the model's accuracy. Materials and Methods. Five lung cancer cell lines with known SF after 1 Gy (SF1), and also SF2 and SF5, were irradiated with three different fractionation regimes; 10 × 1 Gy, 5 × 2 Gy or 2 × 5 Gy during the same total time to achieve empirical SF. In addition, the SF1, SF2 and SF5 after fractionated irradiation was calculated for each cell line based on the already known single fraction SF and with or without a proliferation factor. The results were compared to the empirical data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: By using the clonogenic assay to measure radiosensitivity, prediction of radiosensitivity was improved after fractionated radiotherapy when proliferation was used in the radiobiology model. However, this was not the case in the cell lines where the extrapolation method was used to calculate SF. Thus, a radiobiology model including intrinsic radiosensitivity, measured by the clonogenic assay, as well as proliferation, is better at predicting survival after fractionated radiotherapy, compared to the use of intrinsic radiosensitivity alone.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates a predictive radiobiology model by measurements of surviving fraction (SF) by the clonogenic assay or the extrapolation method and the proliferation rate in vitro. It is hypothesized that incorporating proliferation to intrinsic radiosensitivity, measured by SF, to predict radiation responsiveness after fractionated irradiation adds to the model's accuracy. Materials and Methods. Five lung cancer cell lines with known SF after 1 Gy (SF1), and also SF2 and SF5, were irradiated with three different fractionation regimes; 10 × 1 Gy, 5 × 2 Gy or 2 × 5 Gy during the same total time to achieve empirical SF. In addition, the SF1, SF2 and SF5 after fractionated irradiation was calculated for each cell line based on the already known single fraction SF and with or without a proliferation factor. The results were compared to the empirical data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: By using the clonogenic assay to measure radiosensitivity, prediction of radiosensitivity was improved after fractionated radiotherapy when proliferation was used in the radiobiology model. However, this was not the case in the cell lines where the extrapolation method was used to calculate SF. Thus, a radiobiology model including intrinsic radiosensitivity, measured by the clonogenic assay, as well as proliferation, is better at predicting survival after fractionated radiotherapy, compared to the use of intrinsic radiosensitivity alone.

Key concepts: Radiosensitivity, Radiobiology, Clonogenic assay, Radiation therapy, Nuclear medicine, Dose fractionation, Cancer research, Lung cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fractionated irradiation of five human lung cancer cell lines and prediction of survival according to a radiobiology model. — Research Paper | ScholarLens