2009•Journal of Law and Social PolicyOpen access

Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario

Kent Glowinski

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Reviews the regulatory history of credit bureaus in Ontario, the interplay of privacy and consumer law vis-a-vis consumer credit reporting, case law and credit bureau liability, and discuss the policy rationale for a Credit Report Appeal Tribunal.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Reviews the regulatory history of credit bureaus in Ontario, the interplay of privacy and consumer law vis-a-vis consumer credit reporting, case law and credit bureau liability, and discuss the policy rationale for a Credit Report Appeal Tribunal.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Reviews the regulatory history of credit bureaus in Ontario, the interplay of privacy and consumer law vis-a-vis consumer credit reporting, case law and credit bureau liability, and discuss the policy rationale for a Credit Report Appeal Tribunal.

Key concepts: Appeal, Tribunal, Liability, Business, Credit history, Law, Law and economics, Accounting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario — Research Paper | ScholarLens