On the asymptotic relative efficiency of distributed detection schemes
Rick S. Blum, S.A. Kassam
Abstract
Rick S. Blum, S.A. Kassam
Abstract
The asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of two centralized detection schemes has proved useful in large-sample-size and weak-signal performance analysis. In the paper, ARE is applied to some distributed detection cases which use counting (k out of N) fusion rules. In such cases one finds that ARE generally depends on the power of the tests which can make its application difficult. This dependence turns out to be relatively weak in the cases considered and the ARE is reasonably well approximated by the limit of the ARE as the detection probability approaches the false alarm probability. This approximation should be useful for distributed cases. Some specific results provide the best counting fusion rules for cases with identical sensor detectors if one uses asymptotically large observation sample sizes at each sensor. These results indicate that for false alarm probabilities of less than 0.5, OR rules are generally never optimum.>
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of two centralized detection schemes has proved useful in large-sample-size and weak-signal performance analysis. In the paper, ARE is applied to some distributed detection cases which use counting (k out of N) fusion rules. In such cases one finds that ARE generally depends on the power of the tests which can make its application difficult. This dependence turns out to be relatively weak in the cases considered and the ARE is reasonably well approximated by the limit of the ARE as the detection probability approaches the false alarm probability. This approximation should be useful for distributed cases. Some specific results provide the best counting fusion rules for cases with identical sensor detectors if one uses asymptotically large observation sample sizes at each sensor. These results indicate that for false alarm probabilities of less than 0.5, OR rules are generally never optimum.>
Key concepts: False alarm, Limit (mathematics), Detector, Statistical power, Computer science, Constant false alarm rate, Sample (material), Detection theory