2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

On the asymptotic relative efficiency of distributed detection schemes

Rick S. Blum, S.A. Kassam

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of two centralized detection schemes has proved useful in large-sample-size and weak-signal performance analysis. In the paper, ARE is applied to some distributed detection cases which use counting (k out of N) fusion rules. In such cases one finds that ARE generally depends on the power of the tests which can make its application difficult. This dependence turns out to be relatively weak in the cases considered and the ARE is reasonably well approximated by the limit of the ARE as the detection probability approaches the false alarm probability. This approximation should be useful for distributed cases. Some specific results provide the best counting fusion rules for cases with identical sensor detectors if one uses asymptotically large observation sample sizes at each sensor. These results indicate that for false alarm probabilities of less than 0.5, OR rules are generally never optimum.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of two centralized detection schemes has proved useful in large-sample-size and weak-signal performance analysis. In the paper, ARE is applied to some distributed detection cases which use counting (k out of N) fusion rules. In such cases one finds that ARE generally depends on the power of the tests which can make its application difficult. This dependence turns out to be relatively weak in the cases considered and the ARE is reasonably well approximated by the limit of the ARE as the detection probability approaches the false alarm probability. This approximation should be useful for distributed cases. Some specific results provide the best counting fusion rules for cases with identical sensor detectors if one uses asymptotically large observation sample sizes at each sensor. These results indicate that for false alarm probabilities of less than 0.5, OR rules are generally never optimum.>

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of two centralized detection schemes has proved useful in large-sample-size and weak-signal performance analysis. In the paper, ARE is applied to some distributed detection cases which use counting (k out of N) fusion rules. In such cases one finds that ARE generally depends on the power of the tests which can make its application difficult. This dependence turns out to be relatively weak in the cases considered and the ARE is reasonably well approximated by the limit of the ARE as the detection probability approaches the false alarm probability. This approximation should be useful for distributed cases. Some specific results provide the best counting fusion rules for cases with identical sensor detectors if one uses asymptotically large observation sample sizes at each sensor. These results indicate that for false alarm probabilities of less than 0.5, OR rules are generally never optimum.>

Key concepts: False alarm, Limit (mathematics), Detector, Statistical power, Computer science, Constant false alarm rate, Sample (material), Detection theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the asymptotic relative efficiency of distributed detection schemes — Research Paper | ScholarLens