Report Card Grading and Adaptations: A National Survey of Classroom Practices
William D. Bursuck, Edward A. Polloway, Lisa Plante, Michael H. Epstein, Madhavi Jayanthi, Janet McConeghy
Abstract
William D. Bursuck, Edward A. Polloway, Lisa Plante, Michael H. Epstein, Madhavi Jayanthi, Janet McConeghy
Abstract
A national survey of elementary and secondary general education teachers ( N = 368, response rate of 52%) was conducted to determine the classroom grading practices of general education teachers, including grading adaptations for students with disabilities. Results of this self report survey indicated that teachers find letter and number grades more helpful for students without disabilities than for those with disabilities. Results also indicated that teachers find certain grading adaptations—such as pass-fail grades, portfolios, multiple grades, and grading for effort—helpful for students both with and without disabilities. Implications for training, research, and practice are included.
OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A national survey of elementary and secondary general education teachers ( N = 368, response rate of 52%) was conducted to determine the classroom grading practices of general education teachers, including grading adaptations for students with disabilities. Results of this self report survey indicated that teachers find letter and number grades more helpful for students without disabilities than for those with disabilities. Results also indicated that teachers find certain grading adaptations—such as pass-fail grades, portfolios, multiple grades, and grading for effort—helpful for students both with and without disabilities. Implications for training, research, and practice are included.
Key concepts: Grading (engineering), Report card, Psychology, Mathematics education, General education, Special education, Medical education, Pedagogy