2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Co-benefits of cycling-inclusive : planning and promotion

Tom Godefrooij, Steven Schepel

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This study reviews and discusses how the promotion of cycling as an affordable and clean means of transport, is related to the promotion of road safety. It presents a critical review of current practices, and gives recommendations for bringing transport policies more in line with the aim of encouraging use of bicycles for everyday transport. It evaluates quality requirements for road infrastructure that take the specific characteristics of cyclists into account. Integration of these policies requires that road design is brought in line with the function of a road, and (intended and actual) road user behaviour. Commonly used indicators for road safety will be reviewed to assess the impact of policies and measures. Impact assessments of transport policies tend to rely on indicators for travel time and travel speed by vehicles, and do not take qualitative aspects of transport involving social factors, such as affordability, equity, and social inclusion, into account. Currently, impact assessment on the environment and climate is mainly linked to emissions per vehicle, and not to personal mobility needs. The study concludes that a conceptual approach of defining mobility and accessibility, and an appropriate definition of indicators, cannot be isolated from each other.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study reviews and discusses how the promotion of cycling as an affordable and clean means of transport, is related to the promotion of road safety. It presents a critical review of current practices, and gives recommendations for bringing transport policies more in line with the aim of encouraging use of bicycles for everyday transport. It evaluates quality requirements for road infrastructure that take the specific characteristics of cyclists into account. Integration of these policies requires that road design is brought in line with the function of a road, and (intended and actual) road user behaviour. Commonly used indicators for road safety will be reviewed to assess the impact of policies and measures. Impact assessments of transport policies tend to rely on indicators for travel time and travel speed by vehicles, and do not take qualitative aspects of transport involving social factors, such as affordability, equity, and social inclusion, into account. Currently, impact assessment on the environment and climate is mainly linked to emissions per vehicle, and not to personal mobility needs. The study concludes that a conceptual approach of defining mobility and accessibility, and an appropriate definition of indicators, cannot be isolated from each other.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study reviews and discusses how the promotion of cycling as an affordable and clean means of transport, is related to the promotion of road safety. It presents a critical review of current practices, and gives recommendations for bringing transport policies more in line with the aim of encouraging use of bicycles for everyday transport. It evaluates quality requirements for road infrastructure that take the specific characteristics of cyclists into account. Integration of these policies requires that road design is brought in line with the function of a road, and (intended and actual) road user behaviour. Commonly used indicators for road safety will be reviewed to assess the impact of policies and measures. Impact assessments of transport policies tend to rely on indicators for travel time and travel speed by vehicles, and do not take qualitative aspects of transport involving social factors, such as affordability, equity, and social inclusion, into account. Currently, impact assessment on the environment and climate is mainly linked to emissions per vehicle, and not to personal mobility needs. The study concludes that a conceptual approach of defining mobility and accessibility, and an appropriate definition of indicators, cannot be isolated from each other.

Key concepts: Promotion (chess), Equity (law), Transport engineering, Business, Cycling, Transportation planning, Environmental economics, Risk analysis (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Co-benefits of cycling-inclusive : planning and promotion — Research Paper | ScholarLens