2015Physics of FluidsRequires access

Interaction between a vortex generator and a synthetic jet in a crossflow

Tyler Van Buren, Edward A. Whalen, Michael Amitay

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

The interaction of a combined vortex generator and a finite-span synthetic jet, i.e., a hybrid actuator, with a zero pressure gradient laminar boundary layer over a flat plate was explored experimentally using Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV). The free stream velocity was U∞ = 10 m/s corresponding to a Reynolds number based on the local boundary layer thickness Reδ ≈ 2000. The synthetic jet was activated at multiple blowing ratios, and the vortex generator (placed either upstream or downstream of the synthetic jet) had a height of 1.6 times the local boundary layer thickness. When exposed to the crossflow, the pitched and skewed synthetic jet and vortex generator independently produced a single streamwise vortex in the far field. However, when the combined synthetic jet and vortex generator were placed together on the flat plate, the two streamwise vortices, associated with the two devices, did not combine. When the vortex generator was upstream of the synthetic jet, the jet pushed the vortex generator’s vortex upward into the free stream. When the vortex generator was placed downstream of the synthetic jet, the vortex associated with it was completely destroyed. Although the presence of the vortex generator did not impact the added enstrophy from the synthetic jet, it resulted in higher velocities near the surface when the vortex generator was upstream of the synthetic jet. It was shown that placing the vortex generator upstream of the synthetic jet was imperative for the performance of the hybrid actuator.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The interaction of a combined vortex generator and a finite-span synthetic jet, i.e., a hybrid actuator, with a zero pressure gradient laminar boundary layer over a flat plate was explored experimentally using Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV). The free stream velocity was U∞ = 10 m/s corresponding to a Reynolds number based on the local boundary layer thickness Reδ ≈ 2000. The synthetic jet was activated at multiple blowing ratios, and the vortex generator (placed either upstream or downstream of the synthetic jet) had a height of 1.6 times the local boundary layer thickness. When exposed to the crossflow, the pitched and skewed synthetic jet and vortex generator independently produced a single streamwise vortex in the far field. However, when the combined synthetic jet and vortex generator were placed together on the flat plate, the two streamwise vortices, associated with the two devices, did not combine. When the vortex generator was upstream of the synthetic jet, the jet pushed the vortex generator’s vortex upward into the free stream. When the vortex generator was placed downstream of the synthetic jet, the vortex associated with it was completely destroyed. Although the presence of the vortex generator did not impact the added enstrophy from the synthetic jet, it resulted in higher velocities near the surface when the vortex generator was upstream of the synthetic jet. It was shown that placing the vortex generator upstream of the synthetic jet was imperative for the performance of the hybrid actuator.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The interaction of a combined vortex generator and a finite-span synthetic jet, i.e., a hybrid actuator, with a zero pressure gradient laminar boundary layer over a flat plate was explored experimentally using Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV). The free stream velocity was U∞ = 10 m/s corresponding to a Reynolds number based on the local boundary layer thickness Reδ ≈ 2000. The synthetic jet was activated at multiple blowing ratios, and the vortex generator (placed either upstream or downstream of the synthetic jet) had a height of 1.6 times the local boundary layer thickness. When exposed to the crossflow, the pitched and skewed synthetic jet and vortex generator independently produced a single streamwise vortex in the far field. However, when the combined synthetic jet and vortex generator were placed together on the flat plate, the two streamwise vortices, associated with the two devices, did not combine. When the vortex generator was upstream of the synthetic jet, the jet pushed the vortex generator’s vortex upward into the free stream. When the vortex generator was placed downstream of the synthetic jet, the vortex associated with it was completely destroyed. Although the presence of the vortex generator did not impact the added enstrophy from the synthetic jet, it resulted in higher velocities near the surface when the vortex generator was upstream of the synthetic jet. It was shown that placing the vortex generator upstream of the synthetic jet was imperative for the performance of the hybrid actuator.

Key concepts: Vortex generator, Synthetic jet, Vortex, Physics, Mechanics, Boundary layer, Particle image velocimetry, Jet (fluid)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interaction between a vortex generator and a synthetic jet in a crossflow — Research Paper | ScholarLens