2014Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Can We Be Obliged to Be Selfless?

Lionel Smith

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

It is generally agreed that fiduciary law is concerned with obligations that relate in some way to loyalty. The usual understanding is that there is something called a duty of loyalty. This chapter explores the question whether there is a legal obligation of loyalty; and if so, what does it require? My argument is that the duty of loyalty is not a duty in the strict sense, that corresponds to a claim-right held by another person. Instead, the law incorporates a requirement of loyalty into the way in which the fiduciary exercises her discretionary powers. If they are exercised disloyally, the exercise can be set aside retroactively. This understanding helps us to make sense of the structure of fiduciary law, including the relationships between and among the requirement of loyalty, the no-conflict rules, and the no-profit rule.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is generally agreed that fiduciary law is concerned with obligations that relate in some way to loyalty. The usual understanding is that there is something called a duty of loyalty. This chapter explores the question whether there is a legal obligation of loyalty; and if so, what does it require? My argument is that the duty of loyalty is not a duty in the strict sense, that corresponds to a claim-right held by another person. Instead, the law incorporates a requirement of loyalty into the way in which the fiduciary exercises her discretionary powers. If they are exercised disloyally, the exercise can be set aside retroactively. This understanding helps us to make sense of the structure of fiduciary law, including the relationships between and among the requirement of loyalty, the no-conflict rules, and the no-profit rule.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is generally agreed that fiduciary law is concerned with obligations that relate in some way to loyalty. The usual understanding is that there is something called a duty of loyalty. This chapter explores the question whether there is a legal obligation of loyalty; and if so, what does it require? My argument is that the duty of loyalty is not a duty in the strict sense, that corresponds to a claim-right held by another person. Instead, the law incorporates a requirement of loyalty into the way in which the fiduciary exercises her discretionary powers. If they are exercised disloyally, the exercise can be set aside retroactively. This understanding helps us to make sense of the structure of fiduciary law, including the relationships between and among the requirement of loyalty, the no-conflict rules, and the no-profit rule.

Key concepts: Fiduciary, Obligation, Loyalty, Duty of loyalty, Duty, Law and economics, Argument (complex analysis), Profit (economics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Can We Be Obliged to Be Selfless? — Research Paper | ScholarLens