2006eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)Requires access

Mystery Meat: Where does spam come from, and why does it matter? 1

Christopher Lueg, Jeff Huang, Michael B. Twidale

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Unsolicited commercial email or spam is recognized as a problem disrupting email communication and costing the community dearly. In order to protect recipients from receiving spam, anti-spam measures building on technologies, such as filters and block lists, have been deployed widely. There is some evidence that certain anti-spam measures based on the purported origin of the spam cause unintended consequences which relate to issues of equity of access which we term digital redlining. Spammers have an interest in bypassing such measures by obscuring the real origin of their messages. Investigating these effects means we need to determine the true origin of spam, despite the efforts of spammers to confuse us and spam filters. The aim to find the true origin of spam is different from the objective of most anti-spam developers who are mainly interested in identifying spam when it knocks on their front door (mail server). In this paper we discuss why the difference between originator and delivery host matters when investigating digital redlining. We also highlight some of the difficulties we are facing when trying to determine the originating host as opposed to the delivering host.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Unsolicited commercial email or spam is recognized as a problem disrupting email communication and costing the community dearly. In order to protect recipients from receiving spam, anti-spam measures building on technologies, such as filters and block lists, have been deployed widely. There is some evidence that certain anti-spam measures based on the purported origin of the spam cause unintended consequences which relate to issues of equity of access which we term digital redlining. Spammers have an interest in bypassing such measures by obscuring the real origin of their messages. Investigating these effects means we need to determine the true origin of spam, despite the efforts of spammers to confuse us and spam filters. The aim to find the true origin of spam is different from the objective of most anti-spam developers who are mainly interested in identifying spam when it knocks on their front door (mail server). In this paper we discuss why the difference between originator and delivery host matters when investigating digital redlining. We also highlight some of the difficulties we are facing when trying to determine the originating host as opposed to the delivering host.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Unsolicited commercial email or spam is recognized as a problem disrupting email communication and costing the community dearly. In order to protect recipients from receiving spam, anti-spam measures building on technologies, such as filters and block lists, have been deployed widely. There is some evidence that certain anti-spam measures based on the purported origin of the spam cause unintended consequences which relate to issues of equity of access which we term digital redlining. Spammers have an interest in bypassing such measures by obscuring the real origin of their messages. Investigating these effects means we need to determine the true origin of spam, despite the efforts of spammers to confuse us and spam filters. The aim to find the true origin of spam is different from the objective of most anti-spam developers who are mainly interested in identifying spam when it knocks on their front door (mail server). In this paper we discuss why the difference between originator and delivery host matters when investigating digital redlining. We also highlight some of the difficulties we are facing when trying to determine the originating host as opposed to the delivering host.

Key concepts: Forum spam, Spamming, Spambot, Internet privacy, Computer security, Computer science, Order (exchange), Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mystery Meat: Where does spam come from, and why does it matter? 1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens