Warfarin and epistaxis: should warfarin always be discontinued?
Venkat Srinivasan, H. Patel, Devon John, Alan Worsley
Abstract
Venkat Srinivasan, H. Patel, Devon John, Alan Worsley
Abstract
The object of this study was to determine whether warfarin could be safely continued in patients with epistaxis if the International Normalized Ratio (INR) was within the suggested therapeutic range. Twenty patients on warfarin treatment were compared with controls, matched for age and sex. Local measures for the control of epistaxis were undertaken appropriately in all the patients. In the warfarin group 17 patients (85%) did not discontinue warfarin as the INR was within the suggested range. There were no additional bleeding complications or failure of epistaxis control due to continuation of warfarin. There was no significant difference in the mean hospital stay between the warfarin and non-warfarin groups. It is concluded that warfarin can be continued safely in patients with epistaxis, in appropriate circumstances, and that the policy of stopping warfarin routinely in all patients with epistaxis should be reconsidered.
OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The object of this study was to determine whether warfarin could be safely continued in patients with epistaxis if the International Normalized Ratio (INR) was within the suggested therapeutic range. Twenty patients on warfarin treatment were compared with controls, matched for age and sex. Local measures for the control of epistaxis were undertaken appropriately in all the patients. In the warfarin group 17 patients (85%) did not discontinue warfarin as the INR was within the suggested range. There were no additional bleeding complications or failure of epistaxis control due to continuation of warfarin. There was no significant difference in the mean hospital stay between the warfarin and non-warfarin groups. It is concluded that warfarin can be continued safely in patients with epistaxis, in appropriate circumstances, and that the policy of stopping warfarin routinely in all patients with epistaxis should be reconsidered.
Key concepts: Warfarin, Medicine, Anesthesia, Surgery, Atrial fibrillation, Internal medicine