1997PubMedRequires access

Warfarin and epistaxis: should warfarin always be discontinued?

Venkat Srinivasan, H. Patel, Devon John, Alan Worsley

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

The object of this study was to determine whether warfarin could be safely continued in patients with epistaxis if the International Normalized Ratio (INR) was within the suggested therapeutic range. Twenty patients on warfarin treatment were compared with controls, matched for age and sex. Local measures for the control of epistaxis were undertaken appropriately in all the patients. In the warfarin group 17 patients (85%) did not discontinue warfarin as the INR was within the suggested range. There were no additional bleeding complications or failure of epistaxis control due to continuation of warfarin. There was no significant difference in the mean hospital stay between the warfarin and non-warfarin groups. It is concluded that warfarin can be continued safely in patients with epistaxis, in appropriate circumstances, and that the policy of stopping warfarin routinely in all patients with epistaxis should be reconsidered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The object of this study was to determine whether warfarin could be safely continued in patients with epistaxis if the International Normalized Ratio (INR) was within the suggested therapeutic range. Twenty patients on warfarin treatment were compared with controls, matched for age and sex. Local measures for the control of epistaxis were undertaken appropriately in all the patients. In the warfarin group 17 patients (85%) did not discontinue warfarin as the INR was within the suggested range. There were no additional bleeding complications or failure of epistaxis control due to continuation of warfarin. There was no significant difference in the mean hospital stay between the warfarin and non-warfarin groups. It is concluded that warfarin can be continued safely in patients with epistaxis, in appropriate circumstances, and that the policy of stopping warfarin routinely in all patients with epistaxis should be reconsidered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The object of this study was to determine whether warfarin could be safely continued in patients with epistaxis if the International Normalized Ratio (INR) was within the suggested therapeutic range. Twenty patients on warfarin treatment were compared with controls, matched for age and sex. Local measures for the control of epistaxis were undertaken appropriately in all the patients. In the warfarin group 17 patients (85%) did not discontinue warfarin as the INR was within the suggested range. There were no additional bleeding complications or failure of epistaxis control due to continuation of warfarin. There was no significant difference in the mean hospital stay between the warfarin and non-warfarin groups. It is concluded that warfarin can be continued safely in patients with epistaxis, in appropriate circumstances, and that the policy of stopping warfarin routinely in all patients with epistaxis should be reconsidered.

Key concepts: Warfarin, Medicine, Anesthesia, Surgery, Atrial fibrillation, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Warfarin and epistaxis: should warfarin always be discontinued? — Research Paper | ScholarLens