Effects of traditional, blended and e‐learning on students' achievement in higher education
Awad Ali Yahya Al-Qahtani, Steve Higgins
Abstract
Open-access reader
Awad Ali Yahya Al-Qahtani, Steve Higgins
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract The study investigates the effect of e‐learning, blended learning and classroom learning on students’ achievement. Two experimental groups together with a control group from U mm A l‐ Q ura U niversity in S audi A rabia were identified randomly. To assess students’ achievement in the different groups, pre‐ and post‐achievement tests were used. The results of the study ( N = 148) show that there was a statistically significant difference between the three methods in terms of students’ achievement favouring the blended learning method ( n = 55) with a substantial effect size of 1.34 ( H edges’ g). No significant difference was found between the e‐learning ( n = 43) and traditional learning groups ( n = 50) in terms of students’ achievement and with a negligible effect size of 0.02.
OpenAlex reports 316 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The study investigates the effect of e‐learning, blended learning and classroom learning on students’ achievement. Two experimental groups together with a control group from U mm A l‐ Q ura U niversity in S audi A rabia were identified randomly. To assess students’ achievement in the different groups, pre‐ and post‐achievement tests were used. The results of the study ( N = 148) show that there was a statistically significant difference between the three methods in terms of students’ achievement favouring the blended learning method ( n = 55) with a substantial effect size of 1.34 ( H edges’ g). No significant difference was found between the e‐learning ( n = 43) and traditional learning groups ( n = 50) in terms of students’ achievement and with a negligible effect size of 0.02.
Key concepts: Blended learning, Mathematics education, Significant difference, Psychology, Academic achievement, Teaching method, Student achievement, Educational technology