2008Joseph Rowntree Foundation eBooksRequires access

Community engagement and community cohesion

Marjorie Mayo, Kalbir Shukra, Ben Gidley, Geraldine Blake, Jane Foot, Martin Yarnit, John Diamond

Open publisher page 51 citations

Abstract

An exploration of the challenges to be addressed if government policies to promote community engagement are to be genuinely inclusive of newcomers as well as more established communities. Community engagement and community cohesion are both current public policy priorities. But there have been gaps in our understanding about how to promote community representation in ways that take account of diversity and population change. This research explores: * whose views were being heard and whose were not; * what were the barriers to being heard and how they could be overcome; * how these barriers could be addressed in ways that would promote community cohesion, rather than increasing competition within and between communities. Through three case studies, the study also identifies ways in which new communities can be involved effectively, together with more established communities, thereby increasing cohesion and mutual solidarity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An exploration of the challenges to be addressed if government policies to promote community engagement are to be genuinely inclusive of newcomers as well as more established communities. Community engagement and community cohesion are both current public policy priorities. But there have been gaps in our understanding about how to promote community representation in ways that take account of diversity and population change. This research explores: * whose views were being heard and whose were not; * what were the barriers to being heard and how they could be overcome; * how these barriers could be addressed in ways that would promote community cohesion, rather than increasing competition within and between communities. Through three case studies, the study also identifies ways in which new communities can be involved effectively, together with more established communities, thereby increasing cohesion and mutual solidarity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An exploration of the challenges to be addressed if government policies to promote community engagement are to be genuinely inclusive of newcomers as well as more established communities. Community engagement and community cohesion are both current public policy priorities. But there have been gaps in our understanding about how to promote community representation in ways that take account of diversity and population change. This research explores: * whose views were being heard and whose were not; * what were the barriers to being heard and how they could be overcome; * how these barriers could be addressed in ways that would promote community cohesion, rather than increasing competition within and between communities. Through three case studies, the study also identifies ways in which new communities can be involved effectively, together with more established communities, thereby increasing cohesion and mutual solidarity.

Key concepts: Community cohesion, Cohesion (chemistry), Solidarity, Public relations, Community engagement, Political science, Diversity (politics), Government (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Community engagement and community cohesion — Research Paper | ScholarLens