Comparison of daily filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia in Asian lymphoma patients
Alexandre Chan, Xue Zhen LENG, Joen Chiang, Miriam Tao, Richard Hong Hui Quek, Kevin Kuang Wei Tay, Soon Thye Lim
Abstract
Alexandre Chan, Xue Zhen LENG, Joen Chiang, Miriam Tao, Richard Hong Hui Quek, Kevin Kuang Wei Tay, Soon Thye Lim
Abstract
AIM: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a highly prevalent complication of chemotherapy, particularly in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in Asian lymphoma patients by evaluating the incidence of FN and associated complications. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study in Asian lymphoma patients who received chemotherapy with primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors support between January 2008 and August 2009. Data were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach, which aimed to reflect actual prescribing practices. RESULTS: A total of 204 Asian lymphoma patients were included in this study, with 81 patients in the filgrastim arm and 123 patients in the pegfilgrastim arm. Overall, the incidence of breakthrough FN was similar between the two groups of patients (13.6%: filgrastim arm vs 16.3%: pegfilgrastim arm; P=0.69). Neutropenic complications such as chemotherapy treatment delay and chemotherapy dose reduction were similar between the two arms. CONCLUSION: In Asian patients, pegfilgrastim prophylaxis did not show a therapeutic advantage for preventing neutropenic outcomes compared with filgrastim prophylaxis.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a highly prevalent complication of chemotherapy, particularly in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in Asian lymphoma patients by evaluating the incidence of FN and associated complications. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study in Asian lymphoma patients who received chemotherapy with primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors support between January 2008 and August 2009. Data were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach, which aimed to reflect actual prescribing practices. RESULTS: A total of 204 Asian lymphoma patients were included in this study, with 81 patients in the filgrastim arm and 123 patients in the pegfilgrastim arm. Overall, the incidence of breakthrough FN was similar between the two groups of patients (13.6%: filgrastim arm vs 16.3%: pegfilgrastim arm; P=0.69). Neutropenic complications such as chemotherapy treatment delay and chemotherapy dose reduction were similar between the two arms. CONCLUSION: In Asian patients, pegfilgrastim prophylaxis did not show a therapeutic advantage for preventing neutropenic outcomes compared with filgrastim prophylaxis.
Key concepts: Pegfilgrastim, Filgrastim, Medicine, Febrile neutropenia, Neutropenia, Lymphoma, Chemotherapy, Internal medicine