2013Journal of Paediatrics and Child HealthRequires access

C ‐reactive protein versus erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase in diagnosing bacteraemia in bone and joint infections

Markus Pääkkönen, Markku Kallio, Pentti Kallio, Heikki Peltola

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

AIM: Bacteraemia is common in childhood acute bone and joint infections and demands urgent treatment. Blood C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate and white blood cell count (WBC) are well known and established markers in these infections. Instead, no information is available on serum alkaline phosphatase whose concentration is known to increase in septic conditions. METHODS: In our large prospective treatment trial comprising of 265 children with acute culture-positive bone or joint infection, all these laboratory indices were monitored on admission to hospital. The predictive value to detect bacteraemia was assessed for each of these four indices. RESULTS: In all, 59% of the patients showed bacteraemia. CRP was significantly (P < 0.05) higher among bacteraemic patients, whereas erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase were not. The area under receiver operator characteristic curve for CRP was 0.588 (CI95% 0.524-0.649) and the significance level P (Area = 0.5) was <0.05. CONCLUSION: None of the markers could reliably diagnose bacteraemia. CRP alone was significantly higher among bacteraemic patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: Bacteraemia is common in childhood acute bone and joint infections and demands urgent treatment. Blood C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate and white blood cell count (WBC) are well known and established markers in these infections. Instead, no information is available on serum alkaline phosphatase whose concentration is known to increase in septic conditions. METHODS: In our large prospective treatment trial comprising of 265 children with acute culture-positive bone or joint infection, all these laboratory indices were monitored on admission to hospital. The predictive value to detect bacteraemia was assessed for each of these four indices. RESULTS: In all, 59% of the patients showed bacteraemia. CRP was significantly (P < 0.05) higher among bacteraemic patients, whereas erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase were not. The area under receiver operator characteristic curve for CRP was 0.588 (CI95% 0.524-0.649) and the significance level P (Area = 0.5) was <0.05. CONCLUSION: None of the markers could reliably diagnose bacteraemia. CRP alone was significantly higher among bacteraemic patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: Bacteraemia is common in childhood acute bone and joint infections and demands urgent treatment. Blood C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate and white blood cell count (WBC) are well known and established markers in these infections. Instead, no information is available on serum alkaline phosphatase whose concentration is known to increase in septic conditions. METHODS: In our large prospective treatment trial comprising of 265 children with acute culture-positive bone or joint infection, all these laboratory indices were monitored on admission to hospital. The predictive value to detect bacteraemia was assessed for each of these four indices. RESULTS: In all, 59% of the patients showed bacteraemia. CRP was significantly (P < 0.05) higher among bacteraemic patients, whereas erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase were not. The area under receiver operator characteristic curve for CRP was 0.588 (CI95% 0.524-0.649) and the significance level P (Area = 0.5) was <0.05. CONCLUSION: None of the markers could reliably diagnose bacteraemia. CRP alone was significantly higher among bacteraemic patients.

Key concepts: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Medicine, White blood cell, Alkaline phosphatase, C-reactive protein, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Bacteremia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
C ‐reactive protein versus erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase in diagnosing bacteraemia in bone and joint infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens