2013Journal of Policy Analysis and ManagementRequires access

School Vouchers and Student Outcomes: Experimental Evidence from W ashington, DC

Patrick J. Wolf, Brian Kisida, Babette Gutmann, Michael J. Puma, Nada Eissa, Lou Rizzo

Open publisher page 136 citations

Abstract

Abstract School vouchers are the most contentious form of parental school choice. Vouchers provide government funds that parents can use to send their children to private schools of their choice. Here we examine the empirical question of whether or not a school voucher program in W ashington, DC , affected achievement or the rate of high school graduation for participating students. The D istrict of C olumbia O pportunity S cholarship P rogram ( OSP ) has operated in the nation's capital since 2004, funded by a federal government appropriation. Because the program was oversubscribed in its early years of operation, and vouchers were awarded by lottery, we were able to use the “gold standard” evaluation method of a randomized experiment to determine what impacts the OSP had on student outcomes. Our analysis revealed compelling evidence that the DC voucher program had a positive impact on high school graduation rates, suggestive evidence that the program increased reading achievement, and no evidence that it affected math achievement. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of recent policy developments including the reauthorization of the OSP and the enactment or expansion of more than a dozen school voucher or voucher‐type programs throughout the U nited S tates in 2011 and 2012.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract School vouchers are the most contentious form of parental school choice. Vouchers provide government funds that parents can use to send their children to private schools of their choice. Here we examine the empirical question of whether or not a school voucher program in W ashington, DC , affected achievement or the rate of high school graduation for participating students. The D istrict of C olumbia O pportunity S cholarship P rogram ( OSP ) has operated in the nation's capital since 2004, funded by a federal government appropriation. Because the program was oversubscribed in its early years of operation, and vouchers were awarded by lottery, we were able to use the “gold standard” evaluation method of a randomized experiment to determine what impacts the OSP had on student outcomes. Our analysis revealed compelling evidence that the DC voucher program had a positive impact on high school graduation rates, suggestive evidence that the program increased reading achievement, and no evidence that it affected math achievement. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of recent policy developments including the reauthorization of the OSP and the enactment or expansion of more than a dozen school voucher or voucher‐type programs throughout the U nited S tates in 2011 and 2012.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 136 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract School vouchers are the most contentious form of parental school choice. Vouchers provide government funds that parents can use to send their children to private schools of their choice. Here we examine the empirical question of whether or not a school voucher program in W ashington, DC , affected achievement or the rate of high school graduation for participating students. The D istrict of C olumbia O pportunity S cholarship P rogram ( OSP ) has operated in the nation's capital since 2004, funded by a federal government appropriation. Because the program was oversubscribed in its early years of operation, and vouchers were awarded by lottery, we were able to use the “gold standard” evaluation method of a randomized experiment to determine what impacts the OSP had on student outcomes. Our analysis revealed compelling evidence that the DC voucher program had a positive impact on high school graduation rates, suggestive evidence that the program increased reading achievement, and no evidence that it affected math achievement. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of recent policy developments including the reauthorization of the OSP and the enactment or expansion of more than a dozen school voucher or voucher‐type programs throughout the U nited S tates in 2011 and 2012.

Key concepts: Voucher, Graduation (instrument), School choice, Government (linguistics), Lottery, Political science, Public administration, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
School Vouchers and Student Outcomes: Experimental Evidence from W ashington, DC — Research Paper | ScholarLens