2004Unpublished venueRequires access

A Metamorphic History from Electron Microprobe Dating of Monazite: Variscan Evolution of The Tatra Mountains

Marian Janák, Pavol Siman

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The recent development of the chemical Th-U-Pb method for in situ dating of monazite using an electron microprobe (EMP) has made it possible to determine multiple thermal events during orogenesis (e.g. Montel et al., 1996, Cocherie et al., 1998, Wil-liams et al., 1999). The aim of this study is to constrain a meta-morphic history using EMP dating of monazite on example of the Tatra Mts. We compare our results with those obtained from single-grain, cathodoluminescence-controlled, U-Pb dating of zircons (Poller et al., 2000, Poller and Todt, 2000). Analytical procedure and age determination Analyses of monazites were carried out using the Cameca SX-100 microprobe. Acceleration voltage of 15 kV was used rather then 25 kV, because of less strong ZAF correction factors. The beam diameter varied from 2 to 6 µm according to the possibili-ties to analyse only single phase in the monazite. Larger beam

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The recent development of the chemical Th-U-Pb method for in situ dating of monazite using an electron microprobe (EMP) has made it possible to determine multiple thermal events during orogenesis (e.g. Montel et al., 1996, Cocherie et al., 1998, Wil-liams et al., 1999). The aim of this study is to constrain a meta-morphic history using EMP dating of monazite on example of the Tatra Mts. We compare our results with those obtained from single-grain, cathodoluminescence-controlled, U-Pb dating of zircons (Poller et al., 2000, Poller and Todt, 2000). Analytical procedure and age determination Analyses of monazites were carried out using the Cameca SX-100 microprobe. Acceleration voltage of 15 kV was used rather then 25 kV, because of less strong ZAF correction factors. The beam diameter varied from 2 to 6 µm according to the possibili-ties to analyse only single phase in the monazite. Larger beam

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The recent development of the chemical Th-U-Pb method for in situ dating of monazite using an electron microprobe (EMP) has made it possible to determine multiple thermal events during orogenesis (e.g. Montel et al., 1996, Cocherie et al., 1998, Wil-liams et al., 1999). The aim of this study is to constrain a meta-morphic history using EMP dating of monazite on example of the Tatra Mts. We compare our results with those obtained from single-grain, cathodoluminescence-controlled, U-Pb dating of zircons (Poller et al., 2000, Poller and Todt, 2000). Analytical procedure and age determination Analyses of monazites were carried out using the Cameca SX-100 microprobe. Acceleration voltage of 15 kV was used rather then 25 kV, because of less strong ZAF correction factors. The beam diameter varied from 2 to 6 µm according to the possibili-ties to analyse only single phase in the monazite. Larger beam

Key concepts: Monazite, Metamorphic rock, Geology, Electron microprobe, Microprobe, Geochemistry, Radiometric dating, Cathodoluminescence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Metamorphic History from Electron Microprobe Dating of Monazite: Variscan Evolution of The Tatra Mountains — Research Paper | ScholarLens