Authors’ willingness for second‐opinion teledermatology in difficult‐to‐manage cases: ‘an online survey’

BACKGROUND: Expert non-availability for an instant difficult-to-manage case may limit the online discussion group to provide second-opinion teledermatology for registered dermatologists. Author-based second-opinion teledermatology (AST) is proposed and assessment of authors' response to answer queries and their willingness to participate in teledermatology consultation is analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Authors of 292 articles from seven non-open access dermatology and three general medical journals addressing difficult-to-manage cases from June 2007 to December 2008 participated in this online dermatology authors' survey. Authors' response to reprint requests, answer literature queries and willingness to offer second-opinion teledermatology were the main outcome measures. Perceived views were also documented. RESULTS: The scores for reprints requests vs. received were (chi(2) = 13.57, n = 292), P = 0.000. The scores for articles read, analysed and literature queries sent vs. authors answered were (chi(2) = 11.09, n = 190), P = 0.001. The scores for authors responded to reprints vs. willing to offer second-opinion teledermatology consultation were (chi(2) = 5.65, n = 190), P = 0.017 and authors responded to reprint requests, answered queries and willing to offer second-opinion (chi(2) = 5.65, n = 190), P = 0.017. CONCLUSION: A dermatologist obtains literature, answered queries and constructive suggestions with additional informative material and pools second-opinions from the authors using their e-mail to deliver quality health care. AST is an alternative to online discussion group for second-opinion teledermatology practice in difficult-to-manage cases. Uniform international laws are to be framed to facilitate telemedicine care for a difficult-to-manage case.