1989PubMedRequires access

Use of a dual-precipitation procedure for measuring high-density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3) in normolipidemic serum.

T A Cloey, Paul S. Bachorik

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

We compared results by a dual-precipitation method (J Lipid Res 1982;23:1206-23) for measuring high-density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3) cholesterol with those by ultracentrifugation at d 1.125, using 56 fresh and 105 frozen-stored serum samples. For both methods, HDL2-cholesterol was calculated as the difference between total HDL-cholesterol and HDL3-cholesterol. In general, for pooled serum samples, agreement was closest with ultracentrifugation when we used a dextran sulfate concentration of 5.0 mg/L to precipitate the HDL2-rich fraction, although the optimal concentration varied from 3.0 to 6.8 mg/L for different pools. For individual samples, the values for HDL3 by dual precipitation averaged 12.8% lower than by ultracentrifugation. The coefficients of correlation between the two methods were HDL3, r = 0.70; and HDL2, r = 0.92. The dual-precipitation method reflected the expected sex-related differences in HDL2-cholesterol concentration and inverse relationship with triglyceride concentration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared results by a dual-precipitation method (J Lipid Res 1982;23:1206-23) for measuring high-density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3) cholesterol with those by ultracentrifugation at d 1.125, using 56 fresh and 105 frozen-stored serum samples. For both methods, HDL2-cholesterol was calculated as the difference between total HDL-cholesterol and HDL3-cholesterol. In general, for pooled serum samples, agreement was closest with ultracentrifugation when we used a dextran sulfate concentration of 5.0 mg/L to precipitate the HDL2-rich fraction, although the optimal concentration varied from 3.0 to 6.8 mg/L for different pools. For individual samples, the values for HDL3 by dual precipitation averaged 12.8% lower than by ultracentrifugation. The coefficients of correlation between the two methods were HDL3, r = 0.70; and HDL2, r = 0.92. The dual-precipitation method reflected the expected sex-related differences in HDL2-cholesterol concentration and inverse relationship with triglyceride concentration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared results by a dual-precipitation method (J Lipid Res 1982;23:1206-23) for measuring high-density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3) cholesterol with those by ultracentrifugation at d 1.125, using 56 fresh and 105 frozen-stored serum samples. For both methods, HDL2-cholesterol was calculated as the difference between total HDL-cholesterol and HDL3-cholesterol. In general, for pooled serum samples, agreement was closest with ultracentrifugation when we used a dextran sulfate concentration of 5.0 mg/L to precipitate the HDL2-rich fraction, although the optimal concentration varied from 3.0 to 6.8 mg/L for different pools. For individual samples, the values for HDL3 by dual precipitation averaged 12.8% lower than by ultracentrifugation. The coefficients of correlation between the two methods were HDL3, r = 0.70; and HDL2, r = 0.92. The dual-precipitation method reflected the expected sex-related differences in HDL2-cholesterol concentration and inverse relationship with triglyceride concentration.

Key concepts: Ultracentrifuge, Chemistry, Cholesterol, Chromatography, Triglyceride, Precipitation, Analytical Ultracentrifugation, Fraction (chemistry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of a dual-precipitation procedure for measuring high-density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3) in normolipidemic serum. — Research Paper | ScholarLens