2011•Public Personnel ManagementRequires access

Ledbetter v. Goodyear : Circumscribing Title VII's Discrimination Protections

Mark Bradbury

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In Ledbetter v. Goodyear (2007) the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to clarify Title VII's rules related to the timeliness of pay discrimination claims. The Court's decision formalized the legal difference between discrete instances of discrimination and the lingering effects of discrimination as they relate to how much time an employee has to file a discrimination claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A key distinction was drawn between a discriminatory organizational pay structure and the actions of individual supervisors. Ultimately the Court equated decisions related to pay with other personnel actions and requires employees to promptly file an alleged discriminatory action with the EEOC. When considered in the context of the limitations of the Equal Pay Act, the Ledbetter decision further tips the weighing of interests toward the employer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Ledbetter v. Goodyear (2007) the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to clarify Title VII's rules related to the timeliness of pay discrimination claims. The Court's decision formalized the legal difference between discrete instances of discrimination and the lingering effects of discrimination as they relate to how much time an employee has to file a discrimination claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A key distinction was drawn between a discriminatory organizational pay structure and the actions of individual supervisors. Ultimately the Court equated decisions related to pay with other personnel actions and requires employees to promptly file an alleged discriminatory action with the EEOC. When considered in the context of the limitations of the Equal Pay Act, the Ledbetter decision further tips the weighing of interests toward the employer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Ledbetter v. Goodyear (2007) the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to clarify Title VII's rules related to the timeliness of pay discrimination claims. The Court's decision formalized the legal difference between discrete instances of discrimination and the lingering effects of discrimination as they relate to how much time an employee has to file a discrimination claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A key distinction was drawn between a discriminatory organizational pay structure and the actions of individual supervisors. Ultimately the Court equated decisions related to pay with other personnel actions and requires employees to promptly file an alleged discriminatory action with the EEOC. When considered in the context of the limitations of the Equal Pay Act, the Ledbetter decision further tips the weighing of interests toward the employer.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Equal employment opportunity, Employment discrimination, Commission, Context (archaeology), Law, Age discrimination, Affirmative action

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ledbetter v. Goodyear : Circumscribing Title VII's Discrimination Protections — Research Paper | ScholarLens