2014•Journal of Labor and SocietyOpen access

Theoretical Reflections on the Emergence of Global Labor Solidarity

Kim Scipes

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

This article recognizes that there is no theory of global labor solidarity and tries to lay some groundwork specifically toward developing such. It begins with an examination of “labor imperialism,” which has recently been theoretically grounded, and rejects that. It then discusses previous efforts to theoretically develop the concept of “new labor internationalism,” particularly highlighting the thinking of Peter Waterman. It joins this with Kim Scipes’ three levels of labor internationalism. Following, it replaces the concept of international labor solidarity with global labor solidarity so as to recognize new developments by workers in multiple sites around the globe: workers around the world are no longer waiting for “Northern” labor movements’ resources or even ideas, but are trying to build real labor solidarity across the globe, acting in solidarity with their brothers and sisters from across the world.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article recognizes that there is no theory of global labor solidarity and tries to lay some groundwork specifically toward developing such. It begins with an examination of “labor imperialism,” which has recently been theoretically grounded, and rejects that. It then discusses previous efforts to theoretically develop the concept of “new labor internationalism,” particularly highlighting the thinking of Peter Waterman. It joins this with Kim Scipes’ three levels of labor internationalism. Following, it replaces the concept of international labor solidarity with global labor solidarity so as to recognize new developments by workers in multiple sites around the globe: workers around the world are no longer waiting for “Northern” labor movements’ resources or even ideas, but are trying to build real labor solidarity across the globe, acting in solidarity with their brothers and sisters from across the world.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article recognizes that there is no theory of global labor solidarity and tries to lay some groundwork specifically toward developing such. It begins with an examination of “labor imperialism,” which has recently been theoretically grounded, and rejects that. It then discusses previous efforts to theoretically develop the concept of “new labor internationalism,” particularly highlighting the thinking of Peter Waterman. It joins this with Kim Scipes’ three levels of labor internationalism. Following, it replaces the concept of international labor solidarity with global labor solidarity so as to recognize new developments by workers in multiple sites around the globe: workers around the world are no longer waiting for “Northern” labor movements’ resources or even ideas, but are trying to build real labor solidarity across the globe, acting in solidarity with their brothers and sisters from across the world.

Key concepts: Solidarity, Internationalism (politics), Globe, Labor history, Labor relations, Sociology, Political economy, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Theoretical Reflections on the Emergence of Global Labor Solidarity — Research Paper | ScholarLens