2015BMC GeneticsOpen access

Importance of presenting the variability of the false discovery rate control

Yiting Lin, Wen‐Chung Lee

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple hypothesis testing is a pervasive problem in genomic data analysis. The conventional Bonferroni method which controls the family-wise error rate is conservative and with low power. The current paradigm is to control the false discovery rate. RESULTS: We characterize the variability of the false discovery rate indices (local false discovery rates, q-value and false discovery proportion) using the bootstrapped method. A colon cancer gene-expression data and a visual refractive errors genome-wide association study data are analyzed as demonstration. We found a high variability in false discovery rate controls for typical genomic studies. CONCLUSIONS: We advise researchers to present the bootstrapped standard errors alongside with the false discovery rate indices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Multiple hypothesis testing is a pervasive problem in genomic data analysis. The conventional Bonferroni method which controls the family-wise error rate is conservative and with low power. The current paradigm is to control the false discovery rate. RESULTS: We characterize the variability of the false discovery rate indices (local false discovery rates, q-value and false discovery proportion) using the bootstrapped method. A colon cancer gene-expression data and a visual refractive errors genome-wide association study data are analyzed as demonstration. We found a high variability in false discovery rate controls for typical genomic studies. CONCLUSIONS: We advise researchers to present the bootstrapped standard errors alongside with the false discovery rate indices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple hypothesis testing is a pervasive problem in genomic data analysis. The conventional Bonferroni method which controls the family-wise error rate is conservative and with low power. The current paradigm is to control the false discovery rate. RESULTS: We characterize the variability of the false discovery rate indices (local false discovery rates, q-value and false discovery proportion) using the bootstrapped method. A colon cancer gene-expression data and a visual refractive errors genome-wide association study data are analyzed as demonstration. We found a high variability in false discovery rate controls for typical genomic studies. CONCLUSIONS: We advise researchers to present the bootstrapped standard errors alongside with the false discovery rate indices.

Key concepts: False discovery rate, Bonferroni correction, Multiple comparisons problem, Biology, Computational biology, False positive rate, Statistical power, Statistical hypothesis testing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Importance of presenting the variability of the false discovery rate control — Research Paper | ScholarLens