Influence of scan and pathologic criteria on the specificity of cholescintigraphy: concise communication.
John E. Freitas, Robert Edward Coleman, C. E. Nagle, Robert L. Bree, K. D. Krewer, Milton D. Gross
Abstract
John E. Freitas, Robert Edward Coleman, C. E. Nagle, Robert L. Bree, K. D. Krewer, Milton D. Gross
Abstract
The influence of scan and pathological criteria on the specificity of cholescintigraphy was assessed by a prospective study of 211 patients with suspected acute cholecystitis who underwent cholescintigraphy. Sufficient data were available in all to confirm a final diagnosis. Cholescintigraphy was performed in the standard fashion using 5 mCi of Tc-99m disofenin. Sixty patients had acute cholecystitis, 64 had chronic cholecystitis, and 87 had no demonstrable gallbladder disease. As the scan and pathological criteria for acute cholecystitis were varied from strict to liberal, the sensitivity of cholescintigraphy decreased (100% to 95.3%), the specificity increased (85.1% to 98.6%, and the predictive value increased (68.4% to 96.8%). The use of strict scan and pathological criteria for acute cholecystitis obscures the advantages that accrue from such early detection of acute cholecystitis by cholescintigraphy, and thus are to be avoided. To understand the disparate opinions voiced in the literature, an appreciation is required for the effects of changes in criteria on the specificity and predictive value of cholescintigraphy.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The influence of scan and pathological criteria on the specificity of cholescintigraphy was assessed by a prospective study of 211 patients with suspected acute cholecystitis who underwent cholescintigraphy. Sufficient data were available in all to confirm a final diagnosis. Cholescintigraphy was performed in the standard fashion using 5 mCi of Tc-99m disofenin. Sixty patients had acute cholecystitis, 64 had chronic cholecystitis, and 87 had no demonstrable gallbladder disease. As the scan and pathological criteria for acute cholecystitis were varied from strict to liberal, the sensitivity of cholescintigraphy decreased (100% to 95.3%), the specificity increased (85.1% to 98.6%, and the predictive value increased (68.4% to 96.8%). The use of strict scan and pathological criteria for acute cholecystitis obscures the advantages that accrue from such early detection of acute cholecystitis by cholescintigraphy, and thus are to be avoided. To understand the disparate opinions voiced in the literature, an appreciation is required for the effects of changes in criteria on the specificity and predictive value of cholescintigraphy.
Key concepts: Cholescintigraphy, Medicine, Acute cholecystitis, Pathological, Cholecystitis, Radiology, Predictive value, Gallbladder