1984Clinical ChemistryRequires access

Intercomparison of seven radioimmunoassay kits and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay kit for digoxin.

Kaia Erickson, P J Green

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Samples from 33 patients being treated with digoxin and three concentrations of control material were analyzed for this drug by use of seven radioimmunoassay (RIA) kits and an automated fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) system. CVs ranged from 2.4 to 6.4% for the FPIA system and from 4.6 to 7.4% for two RIA methods. In the analysis of between-method variability of RIA kits, CVs ranged from 6.1 to 33.2%. We compared each RIA kit with the other six RIA kits (I), as well as each RIA kit with the FPIA system (II). Correlation coefficients were greater than or equal to 0.96 in all cases. Slopes ranged from 0.82 to 1.20 for comparison I and from 0.86 to 1.01 for comparison II. For the FPIA system, analytical recovery of digoxin ranged from 94 to 104%. For the RIA methods we examined, analytical recoveries ranged from 113 to 135%. Analysis time is shorter and precision is greater for the FPIA system than for the RIA methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Samples from 33 patients being treated with digoxin and three concentrations of control material were analyzed for this drug by use of seven radioimmunoassay (RIA) kits and an automated fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) system. CVs ranged from 2.4 to 6.4% for the FPIA system and from 4.6 to 7.4% for two RIA methods. In the analysis of between-method variability of RIA kits, CVs ranged from 6.1 to 33.2%. We compared each RIA kit with the other six RIA kits (I), as well as each RIA kit with the FPIA system (II). Correlation coefficients were greater than or equal to 0.96 in all cases. Slopes ranged from 0.82 to 1.20 for comparison I and from 0.86 to 1.01 for comparison II. For the FPIA system, analytical recovery of digoxin ranged from 94 to 104%. For the RIA methods we examined, analytical recoveries ranged from 113 to 135%. Analysis time is shorter and precision is greater for the FPIA system than for the RIA methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Samples from 33 patients being treated with digoxin and three concentrations of control material were analyzed for this drug by use of seven radioimmunoassay (RIA) kits and an automated fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) system. CVs ranged from 2.4 to 6.4% for the FPIA system and from 4.6 to 7.4% for two RIA methods. In the analysis of between-method variability of RIA kits, CVs ranged from 6.1 to 33.2%. We compared each RIA kit with the other six RIA kits (I), as well as each RIA kit with the FPIA system (II). Correlation coefficients were greater than or equal to 0.96 in all cases. Slopes ranged from 0.82 to 1.20 for comparison I and from 0.86 to 1.01 for comparison II. For the FPIA system, analytical recovery of digoxin ranged from 94 to 104%. For the RIA methods we examined, analytical recoveries ranged from 113 to 135%. Analysis time is shorter and precision is greater for the FPIA system than for the RIA methods.

Key concepts: Radioimmunoassay, Fluorescence polarization immunoassay, Digoxin, Immunoassay, Chromatography, Fluorescence anisotropy, Chemistry, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intercomparison of seven radioimmunoassay kits and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay kit for digoxin. — Research Paper | ScholarLens