2015Journal of Law Policy and GlobalizationRequires access

The Power of Judicial Review in the Promotion of Constitutionalism in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects

Imo J. Udofa

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The judiciary, as the guardian of constitutionalism, ensures that the organs of government do not stray into the sphere of each other, and that powers and authority are exercised within prescribed constitutional boundaries.  Accordingly, the judiciary acts as a watchdog over the other organs of government and ensures their fidelity to the doctrine of separation of powers and respect for the supremacy of the Constitution.  This Article assesses the exercise of the power of judicial review of executive and legislative actions by the Nigerian courts.   Lessons are also drawn from other jurisdictions, such as the United States of America, Ghana and South Africa.  While the performance of the judiciary in Nigeria has so far been commendable, several factors continue to impede its attainment of optimal performance.  These include lack of judicial independence, impact of corruption and judicial philosophy of supporting the executive, amongst others.    These problems must be addressed through proper selection and appointment of people of integrity as judicial officers, training and re-training of judicial officers, improved conditions of service and effective control of the performance of judicial officers, amongst others; in order to enhance the utilisation of the power of judicial review in the promotion of constitutionalism in Nigeria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The judiciary, as the guardian of constitutionalism, ensures that the organs of government do not stray into the sphere of each other, and that powers and authority are exercised within prescribed constitutional boundaries.  Accordingly, the judiciary acts as a watchdog over the other organs of government and ensures their fidelity to the doctrine of separation of powers and respect for the supremacy of the Constitution.  This Article assesses the exercise of the power of judicial review of executive and legislative actions by the Nigerian courts.   Lessons are also drawn from other jurisdictions, such as the United States of America, Ghana and South Africa.  While the performance of the judiciary in Nigeria has so far been commendable, several factors continue to impede its attainment of optimal performance.  These include lack of judicial independence, impact of corruption and judicial philosophy of supporting the executive, amongst others.    These problems must be addressed through proper selection and appointment of people of integrity as judicial officers, training and re-training of judicial officers, improved conditions of service and effective control of the performance of judicial officers, amongst others; in order to enhance the utilisation of the power of judicial review in the promotion of constitutionalism in Nigeria.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The judiciary, as the guardian of constitutionalism, ensures that the organs of government do not stray into the sphere of each other, and that powers and authority are exercised within prescribed constitutional boundaries.  Accordingly, the judiciary acts as a watchdog over the other organs of government and ensures their fidelity to the doctrine of separation of powers and respect for the supremacy of the Constitution.  This Article assesses the exercise of the power of judicial review of executive and legislative actions by the Nigerian courts.   Lessons are also drawn from other jurisdictions, such as the United States of America, Ghana and South Africa.  While the performance of the judiciary in Nigeria has so far been commendable, several factors continue to impede its attainment of optimal performance.  These include lack of judicial independence, impact of corruption and judicial philosophy of supporting the executive, amongst others.    These problems must be addressed through proper selection and appointment of people of integrity as judicial officers, training and re-training of judicial officers, improved conditions of service and effective control of the performance of judicial officers, amongst others; in order to enhance the utilisation of the power of judicial review in the promotion of constitutionalism in Nigeria.

Key concepts: Constitutionalism, Judicial independence, Judicial review, Separation of powers, Political science, Legislature, Law, Constitution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Power of Judicial Review in the Promotion of Constitutionalism in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects — Research Paper | ScholarLens