Prosodic Breaks in Sentence Processing Investigated by Event‐Related Potentials
Sara Bögels, Herbert J. Schriefers, Wietske Vonk, Dorothee J. Chwilla
Abstract
Sara Bögels, Herbert J. Schriefers, Wietske Vonk, Dorothee J. Chwilla
Abstract
Abstract Prosodic breaks (PBs) can indicate a sentence’s syntactic structure. Event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) are an excellent way to study auditory sentence processing, since they provide an on‐line measure across a complete sentence, in contrast to other on‐ and off‐line methods. ERPs for the first time allowed investigating the processing of a PB itself. PBs reliably elicit a closure positive shift (CPS). We first review several studies on the CPS, leading to the conclusion that it is elicited by abstract structuring or phrasing of the input. Then we review ERP findings concerning the role of PBs in sentence processing as indicated by ERP components like the N400, P600 and LAN. We focus on whether and how PBs can (help to) disambiguate locally ambiguous sentences. Differences in results between different studies can be related to differences in items, initial parsing preferences and tasks. Finally, directions for future research are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Prosodic breaks (PBs) can indicate a sentence’s syntactic structure. Event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) are an excellent way to study auditory sentence processing, since they provide an on‐line measure across a complete sentence, in contrast to other on‐ and off‐line methods. ERPs for the first time allowed investigating the processing of a PB itself. PBs reliably elicit a closure positive shift (CPS). We first review several studies on the CPS, leading to the conclusion that it is elicited by abstract structuring or phrasing of the input. Then we review ERP findings concerning the role of PBs in sentence processing as indicated by ERP components like the N400, P600 and LAN. We focus on whether and how PBs can (help to) disambiguate locally ambiguous sentences. Differences in results between different studies can be related to differences in items, initial parsing preferences and tasks. Finally, directions for future research are discussed.
Key concepts: P600, Sentence processing, Sentence, N400, Parsing, Computer science, Focus (optics), Contrast (vision)