Surface microhardness evaluation of enamel and dentin in bovine and human teeth (permanent and deciduous)
Tiago Aurélio Donassollo, Ana Regina Romano, Flávio Fernando Demarco, Álvaro Della Bona
Abstract
Tiago Aurélio Donassollo, Ana Regina Romano, Flávio Fernando Demarco, Álvaro Della Bona
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the surface microhardness of enamel (E) and dentin (D) from human deciduous molar teeth (Group d), human permanent molar teeth (Group p) and bovine incisor teeth (Group b). Four specimens were selected for each group and stored in saline solution until testing. The specimens were embedded into a resin matrix and polished to 600 grit SiC paper creating a flat enamel surface. The Knoop hardness test was performed in a microhardness device, using a 200 g load. Five measurements were made in each specimen. After that, specimens were polished to expose dentin (near to dentinenamel junction), and other five microhardness measurements were performed per specimen. The values were calculated and statistically analyzed (ANOVA and Tukey tests). Mean hardness values (kg/mm2) and standard deviations were as follows: Ed 338 ± 30.1; Ep 341 ± 32.8; Eb 326 ± 25.5; Dd 104 ± 9.7; Dp 93.3 ± 8.7; Db 91.2 ± 7.3. The microhardness in enamel (E) was statistically higher than in dentin (D) for the three type of teeth studied (p UNITERMS: microhardness; human teeth; bovine teeth.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the surface microhardness of enamel (E) and dentin (D) from human deciduous molar teeth (Group d), human permanent molar teeth (Group p) and bovine incisor teeth (Group b). Four specimens were selected for each group and stored in saline solution until testing. The specimens were embedded into a resin matrix and polished to 600 grit SiC paper creating a flat enamel surface. The Knoop hardness test was performed in a microhardness device, using a 200 g load. Five measurements were made in each specimen. After that, specimens were polished to expose dentin (near to dentinenamel junction), and other five microhardness measurements were performed per specimen. The values were calculated and statistically analyzed (ANOVA and Tukey tests). Mean hardness values (kg/mm2) and standard deviations were as follows: Ed 338 ± 30.1; Ep 341 ± 32.8; Eb 326 ± 25.5; Dd 104 ± 9.7; Dp 93.3 ± 8.7; Db 91.2 ± 7.3. The microhardness in enamel (E) was statistically higher than in dentin (D) for the three type of teeth studied (p UNITERMS: microhardness; human teeth; bovine teeth.
Key concepts: Knoop hardness test, Enamel paint, Dentin, Indentation hardness, Molar, Dentistry, Materials science, Deciduous teeth